 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Beatrice Michael
|
Post subject: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:44 am |
|
Posts: 29
|
|
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement. Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial? A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families. B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has. C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed. D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level. E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
Can an expert please explain why C is the answer
according to A if the gov collects no taxes for the unemployed it is a financial incentive so it weakens the argument/conclusion where itt states that the unemployed have no Financial incentive with this
I would go with C because in the overall argument it would prove that the unemployed get lower paying jobs hence no financial incentive
Please explain and thankyou for your help and time....:)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
tim
|
Post subject: Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:04 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 4410 Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
|
|
C provides a definite financial incentive for people to get a job even if they will make no more than the unemployment benefits. A actually strengthens the argument, because if unemployment benefits are untaxed but work is taxed, there is actually a financial disincentive to get low-paying work..
_________________ Tim Sanders Manhattan GMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|
 |