jp.jprasanna wrote:
Dear Ron - Could you please let me know what's wrong with A and B?
(a) "... and (not necessarily) foreshadow
ing" is not parallel to anything.
(b) this sentence doesn't make sense.
if you write
analysts said that x and not necessarily that y, then the meaning is ...
... analysts definitely said x
... we're not certain whether analysts said y
that's not the meaning here. the intended meaning is that the analysts actually said all of this stuff: that the increase resulted from xxxxxxxx, but that it doesn't have to mean xxxxxxx.
by contrast, here's a legitimate sentence that could use the above construction:
Laura said that she was angry at me but not that she wanted to leave me--> Laura said that she was angry. She didn't say that she wanted to leave me (but also didn't say that she would stay, either).
Laura said that she was angry at me but did not want to leave me--> Laura said two things: (a) she was angry, (b) she nevertheless did not want to leave the relationship.
Quote:
Also is the "it" in B ambiguous? I thought the "it" clearly refers to the increase.
the pronoun is fine.