confused wrote:
So does this mean that the phrase "In addition to her work on the Miocene hominid fossil record" can refer to either "Mary Leakey's contributions" or "Mary Leakey" and still be correct?
I got the second question wrong on GMATPREP because I thought the phrase must refer to "Mery Leakey's contributions" and not just "Mary Leakey". Would someone explain why the phrase can refer to either of them?
i think you're referring to something along these lines:
coming home from school, the wind blew me off my bike.--> this sentence is wrong, because "coming home from school" is taken to refer to the wind.
apparently this isn't the same sort of thing.
if these problems are really both official (which would be weird), then i would abstract the following lesson:
the strict application of the opening phrase to the immediately following subject is, apparently, limited to cases in which the opening phrase contains a PARTICIPLE (-ing, -ed), etc.since this sentence starts with a prepositional phrase (in addition to), not a participle, it apparently doesn't follow the same rule.
note my copious use of the word "apparently"; i'm learning lessons from this problem, just as you are.