The violent crime rate in meadowbrooks is 60% higher now than it was four years ago. The corresponding increase for Parkdale is only 10%. Hence MB residents are more likely to become victims of crime that PD residents
The argument above is flawed b/c it fails to take into account
A) Changes in pop. density in MD and PD over the last 4 years B) how the Rate of Pop. growth in MD over last four years compares to the corresponding rate for PD c) violent crime rates in MD and PD 4 years ago
..alrighty I am tired of typing now.... the rest two choices are out of scope and not including them here.. Gprep question OA C
B is pretty close to. why is B wrong ? Since the premises are about crime rates, and the Conclusion is victims, I chose B right away ..
You have to find a flaw. Q talks about increase in rates and deduces that city with higher increase is more dreadful.
How about 4 years ago crime rate was 10% and now 70% in MB and 70% 4 years ago and 80% now in PD? Flawed right
To me B was not even close.
Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Learn concepts that are most likely to appear on the GMAT.
Study Hall: Thursdays with Ron
Every other Thursday, join Ron Purewal for an hour and a half study session. Submit your questions online beforehand and Ron will handpick ones to teach during the session.
Answer our weekly GMAT math problem for a chance to win! Each week one correct answer is chosen to win guides and more. The more people enter, the better the prize!
Do you have what it takes to become a Manhattan GMAT instructor? If you have a 99th percentile score and prior teaching experience, apply here to make $100 an hour.
Not quite ready to be an instructor yourself? If you refer a friend to us and we hire them, we'll give you $1000.