Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: The violent crime rate
 Post Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:55 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 69
The violent crime rate in meadowbrooks is 60% higher now than it was four years ago. The corresponding increase for Parkdale is only 10%. Hence MB residents are more likely to become victims of crime that PD residents

The argument above is flawed b/c it fails to take into account

A) Changes in pop. density in MD and PD over the last 4 years
B) how the Rate of Pop. growth in MD over last four years compares to the corresponding rate for PD
c) violent crime rates in MD and PD 4 years ago

..alrighty I am tired of typing now.... the rest two choices are out of scope and not including them here..
Gprep question
OA C

B is pretty close to. why is B wrong ? Since the premises are about crime rates, and the Conclusion is victims, I chose B right away ..


Top 
 Post subject: Re: The violent crime rate
 Post Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:14 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 42
You have to find a flaw. Q talks about increase in rates and deduces that city with higher increase is more dreadful.

How about 4 years ago crime rate was 10% and now 70% in MB and 70% 4 years ago and 80% now in PD? Flawed right

To me B was not even close.


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: