Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: The panda and bear comparision
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:08 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 2
Though laypeople often refer to the panda as a bear, due to its physical resemblance to one, DNA testing has shown that it is more closely related to the common raccoon than any member of the bear family.

a) because of its physical resemblance to one, DNA testing has shown that it is more closely related to the common raccoon than

b) because of its physical resemblance to one, DNA testing has shown that it is more closely related to the common raccoon than to

This is from a MGMAT CAT and the explanation is unclear. Why is b correct?

Is this a parallelism thing, "more related to X than to Y.."?

thanks!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: The panda and bear comparision
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:45 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 723
(A) X is more closely related to Y than Z. (ambiguous)
(B) X is more closely related to Y than to Z.
(C) X is more closely related to Y than Z is.

Notice that adding a "to" clearly shows that Y and Z are each being compared. When you use the first comparison, you could be saying that X is more closely related to Y than Z is related to Y. (A) is pretty ambiguous either way. Either include a "to" to compare Y and Z (B), or include an "is" after the Z to compare X and Z (C).

_________________
Joe Lucero
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron