How did I study:---
QUANT-- DS was a weakness so practiced more problems with different solution techniques-- algebra, plugging in numbers, back solving.
PS --had to work on few topics such as inequalities, exponent equations, absolute values, rates and combination/permutation, to get my score from 44 to 48.
VERBAL--RC was never an issue, except some difficult inference and application questions, so I reviewed them and analysed where I was going wrong. Also noticed that for me RC topics involving science/technology and business were easy to do (got 5/6 or 6/6 correct in the OG),but Topics related to literature and sociology were a bit difficult (got 5/7, 3-4/6 correct in the OG)
CR--followed the method mentioned in power score CR and commonsense.I was facing a problem with Evaluate the plan questions, bold faced and few difficult assumption questions. After revision was able to increase my performance--3 questions wrong out of 15 on my last gmat prep.
SC--was difficult earlier, but did OG again with emphasis on meaning, parallelism, s-v and modifiers, timing myself. Thursday's with Ron sessions were a great help for SC.Improved my accuracy from 50% (7-8 questions wrong out of 17 SC questions) to around 4 questions wrong out of 17 questions)
TIMING--this was another BIG issue as I didn't let go off questions ,bad guessing strategy that resulted in solving(last 7 questions in 5 mins)and hence my errors were highest towards the end of the sections. This was an area which I could improve, but not in totality (last 4 questions in 5 mins)
Thanks a lot kartik for the info.I will have a look at Grockit. I agree that Manhattan mock passages are bit easier in comparison to actual GMAT. May be I did miss out on patterns in the actual exam, because people who took the test recently scoring in the 670-680 range did say that they found the actual SC and RC very difficult in comparison to Gmatprep & Manhattan mocks. So at 600 I must not have encountered those questions or got them wrong. Moreover, the gmatprep questions tend to be repetitive and thus you can't get a real estimate of your score. I will need a fresh block of questions to get a reliable estimate.
kartik.money wrote:
Sorry to hear about the verbal score but don't let it get you down! Verbal is tricky but once you begin spotting patterns in the questions, it's a matter of identifying the type of answer that is most likely to be correct. SC is more deterministic in that there are a finite set of rules that are easily recognizable once you've had more practice. So it may be likely that you got snagged on RC or CR. CR Bible really helped me rethink my approach to the CR questions. One thing I did notice with the MGMAT mocks is that the Verbal sections were definitely easier (esp the RCs) and I had to look elsewhere for harder RC practice. Have you ever tried Grockit? If so, maybe it's worth taking a look. Grockit has recycled questions from old OGs and is a really good resource especially in the last week of prep. I found it especially useful for RC - cause if you want to test how well you do on dry cryptic material, you'll find the best examples in Grockit.
anyway I hope this helps. Good luck!