Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Telecom minister SC
 Post Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:54 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 5
22. The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum
scam, which resulted in a loss of about $1.7 trillion to the exchequer.
A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which
resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which
resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which
resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting


OA is C

Why can't the right answer be D?

Thanks for your help!

Source: Aristotle prep SC


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Telecom minister SC
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:38 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 1857
"is" is a present tense verb and pairing it with "indicted" which indicates that someone was indicted in the past doesn't make sense.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: