Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 4:52 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 5
Thanks Tim and Samarpan!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 4:09 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 1857
Thanks!

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:52 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 8
Ron/Stacey,

E. an event that caused the plant and animal extinctions that mark

Yes, E is correct.

Why do we have to use an appositive (an evnet) in option E.

Can't we simply say

"causing the plant and animal extinctions that mark"

- making sure that the result from the preceding independent clause (an asteroid slammed into North America) caused the plant and animal extinctions

isn't it a preferred (in GMAT lang.) one to the one (choice E) that uses an appositive (an event)

My apologies if i am slightly off the topic.

Regards,
Murali.

Regards,
Murali.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 4:33 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
muralik.abm wrote:
Why do we have to use an appositive (an evnet) in option E.


we don't have to; it's just one phrasing that works.

just because one version of a sentence is correct, you can't assume that other versions are incorrect!

Quote:
Can't we simply say

"causing the plant and animal extinctions that mark"

- making sure that the result from the preceding independent clause (an asteroid slammed into North America) caused the plant and animal extinctions


that seems ok to me, too.

Quote:
isn't it a preferred (in GMAT lang.) one to the one (choice E) that uses an appositive (an event)


well, both are legitimate.
even if one of them is "preferred", that issue is irrelevant from the standpoint of a gmat student -- you will never be faced with two correct versions of a sentence and forced to select the "preferred" version. your only job here is to tell right from wrong.
sentence correction is already difficult enough; there's little sense in adding additional, unnecessary layers of distinction, such as "preferred"/"not preferred". that just takes something that's already hard and makes it harder!

--

if there is a distinction, i'd say the appositive allows for more indirect causation. i.e., if you use the comma -ING modifier, then there's a sense that the causation was immediate and direct; if you use the appositive, that *could* still be the meaning, but the appositive also allows for the possibility that "the event" set off a chain of events that caused the extinctions more indirectly after a number of steps.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:38 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 3
I had the same question as Murali did.

Thanks Ron for the excellent explanation. :)


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 1:14 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
good stuff


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:32 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 47
Hi instructors,

I was debating between D and E. After reading Stacey's explanation, I'm still not so sure what "it" in D is referring to:

D. an event that caused plant and animal extinctions, and it marks

can "it" be referring to "an asteroid bigger than Mount Everest slammed into North America" baseed on how this parallelism is set up?

Thanks!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:52 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2242
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
my best guess would be the event, but keep in mind D is not the correct answer anyway, so the pronoun confusion is not surprising.. :)

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:23 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 47
tim wrote:
my best guess would be the event, but keep in mind D is not the correct answer anyway, so the pronoun confusion is not surprising.. :)


I see, thanks Tim!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:21 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
.


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: