Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 2 [ 22 posts ] Go to page 1, 2  Next



 
Author Message
 Post subject: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:30 am 
Recent studies suggest that an intake of vitamin E in excess of that found naturally in a balanced diet may actually increase the risk of developing certain illnesses, despite the claims of thousands of people who swear by it as a dietary supplement.


The subject of the sentence here is 'intake of Vit E' .In the last part of the sentence use of pronoun 'it ' actually refers to Vit E .Is this correct ?


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:36 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 380
The true subject of the sentence is actually "studies," but you're right that "intake" is also a subject (just of the next part, the cluase beginning with "that"). In either case, the "it" does refer back to the "vitamin E."


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:49 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 13
Recent studies suggest that an intake of vitamin E in excess of that found naturally in a balanced diet may actually increase the risk of developing certain illnesses, despite the claims of thousands of people who swear by it as a dietary supplement.


should it not be increases, as the verb increases point to "intake of vitamin E",which is singular


Top 
 Post subject: Re:
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:56 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
JonathanSchneider wrote:
The true subject of the sentence is actually "studies,"


to readers:
yes, this statement of jonathan's is true. however, this is NOT how you want to analyze sentences that start off with things like this.

if a sentence starts off with something like "my friend said that", "studies have shown that", "paleontologists believe that", "X has found that", etc., then simply IGNORE those words altogether. as pointed out in our subject-verb agreement lesson, these types of things are "WARMUPS".
if a sentence has the structure X has said/found/demonstrated that xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, then you can just consider the xxxxxxxxxxxx itself as the sentence.
unless, of course, the "warmup" is included in the underline (which will almost never be the case).


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:58 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
shyamprasadrao wrote:
Recent studies suggest that an intake of vitamin E in excess of that found naturally in a balanced diet may actually increase the risk of developing certain illnesses, despite the claims of thousands of people who swear by it as a dietary supplement.


should it not be increases, as the verb increases point to "intake of vitamin E",which is singular


no, because it's paired with "may". you can't write "may increases".

if a verb is paired with a helping word such as may/might/could/etc., then you stick with the infinitive form (minus "to").
for instance, a clearer example: you would say
he may BE right.
you would definitely not say he may is right.

same deal here, although there is a little more noise in the way.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:37 pm 
Offline


Posts: 12
Might be a dumb question, so I apologize in advance. But how are we grammatically sure that It refers back to intake of vitamin E? Aren't there quite a few potential nouns in between that can serve as antecedents (I realize that logically, It refers to vitamin E, but wanted to be sure on the rule here)?

thanks!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:51 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 20
i.ahmed111 wrote:
Might be a dumb question, so I apologize in advance. But how are we grammatically sure that It refers back to intake of vitamin E? Aren't there quite a few potential nouns in between that can serve as antecedents (I realize that logically, It refers to vitamin E, but wanted to be sure on the rule here)?

thanks!


I am also unsure on how "it" is referred directly to "Vitamin E" and not another singular noun like "diet".

MGMAT Staff, can you please clarify? thanks!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:32 pm 
Offline


Posts: 12
MGMAT staff, any takers?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:13 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
i.ahmed111 wrote:
MGMAT staff, any takers?


remember, guys, pronoun ambiguity is NOT an absolute rule. i.e., not all ambiguous pronouns are incorrect.

here are several examples:
post35595.html#p35595
post35036.html#p35036
post30203.html#p30203
post30983.html#p30983
(all OFFICIAL problems on which ambiguous pronouns are tolerated in the correct answer)


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 8:58 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 89
Recent studies suggest that an intake of vitamin E in excess of that found naturally in a balanced diet may actually increase the risk of developing certain illnesses, despite the claims of thousands of people who swear by it as a dietary supplement.

(A) Recent studies suggest that an intake of vitamin E in excess of that found naturally in a balanced diet may actually increase the risk of developing certain illnesses

(B) Recent studies suggest that taking vitamin E in excess of that found naturally in a balanced diet actually increases the risk of developing certain illnesses

(C) Certain illnesses may be at a higher risk of development if vitamin E is taken in excess of a balanced diet, according to recent studies

(D) According to recent studies, the intake of vitamin E, if in excess of that found naturally in a balanced diet, may actually increase developing certain illnesses

(E) Vitamin E, recent studies suggest, if in excess of that found naturally in a balanced diet, may actually increase the development risk of certain illnesses



The explanation given is:
The phrase “actually increases” has a stronger meaning than the author intended - that high vitamin E consumption “may actually increase” certain risks.

My query is whether "B" has any other mistake apart from meaning?

I mean, how can we be certain of "what the author intends". Can't we say that as "suggests" already appears, "May" is redundant?

Pls help.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:56 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2242
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
"suggest" and "may" is actually a natural pairing and appropriately hedges the research findings. The real reason B is wrong is because there is a parallelism problem. In A "intake" is parallel with "that", but in B "taking" is not parallel with "that"..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:25 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 3
tim wrote:
"suggest" and "may" is actually a natural pairing and appropriately hedges the research findings. The real reason B is wrong is because there is a parallelism problem. In A "intake" is parallel with "that", but in B "taking" is not parallel with "that"..

Hi,
Could you elaborate on the parallelism part in B.

Thanks,
Shev


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:22 am 
Offline
Prospective Students


Posts: 26
Adding another angle to the SC forensics here pertaining to A over B discussion .

Doesn't A have an edge over B due to the correct idiomatic usage of "intake of", even if we missed, as I did :), the hard-to-spot-on-DDay'ish parallelism issue in B?

Isn't "Intake Of" related to whatever the hand can put into the mouth for bodily consumption, whereas the "taking" is little away from that idea.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 7:11 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 27
Quote:
"suggest" and "may" is actually a natural pairing and appropriately hedges the research findings. The real reason B is wrong is because there is a parallelism problem. In A "intake" is parallel with "that", but in B "taking" is not parallel with "that"..


I believe that THAT relates to VITAMIN E, rather than to AN INTAKE.

For me the usage of gerund with verb in B (TAKING ... INCREASES) does not sound good. Am I right?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC -- Vit E excess
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 4:28 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 1857
kvitkod wrote:
Quote:
"suggest" and "may" is actually a natural pairing and appropriately hedges the research findings. The real reason B is wrong is because there is a parallelism problem. In A "intake" is parallel with "that", but in B "taking" is not parallel with "that"..


I believe that THAT relates to VITAMIN E, rather than to AN INTAKE.

For me the usage of gerund with verb in B (TAKING ... INCREASES) does not sound good. Am I right?


I don't see the grammar problem. For example, I could say:

Walking daily decreases the risk of heart attack.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 2 [ 22 posts ] Go to page 1, 2  Next





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: