Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: SC that I don't understand...
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:05 am 
In the following SC, should the correct answer, C, use LEADS instead of LEAD? The mgmat book explicity says you should omit whatever follows the 'of' clause. That means the subject is A CYCLE (singular) and the corresponding verb should be LEADS, not lead. Can an mgmat instructor please explain?

An economic recession can result from a lowering of employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, which causes people to cut consumer spending and starts a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.



A) a lowering of employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, which causes people to cut consumer spending and start a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.

B) a lowering of employment rates triggered by dropping investment, which cause people to cut consumer spending and starts a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.

C) falling employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, causing cutbacks in consumer spending and starting a cycle of layoffs that lead to even lower employment rates.

D) falling employment rates that are triggered by a drop in investment, causing people to cut consumer spending and starting a cycle of layoffs that lead back to even lower employment rates.

E) falling employment rates that are triggered by a drop in investment, that cause cutbacks in consumer spending and the start of a cycle of layoffs leading to even lower employment rates.


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:03 pm 
Hi,

In this particular case "cycle of layoffs" is one word, rather a plural subject that requires a plural verb,
and the "of" that you are referring to is the modifying phrase in a sentence that modifys the subject of the sentence, here the "of" is a part of the subject.

Hope that helps,


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:27 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 901
Location: St. Louis, MO
A relative clause (begins with that, which, who, etc.) modifies the noun immediately before it, with VERY rare exceptions.

In this case, the immediately preceding noun is the plural "layoffs," so the verb "lead" within the relative clause must be plural. It's as if it reads "layoffs lead to even lower employment rates," which is logical. It is not the cycle itself that leads to lower employment, but rather the actually layoffs!

_________________
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: