| Author |
Message |
|
spandey1982
|
Post subject: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:59 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 6
|
|
While the stock market was bouncing back from its 2002 low, U.S. families are still reeling from the recent recession; between 2001 to 2004, typical household savings plummeted nearly 25% and the median household debt rose by a third. A) was bouncing back from its 2002 low, U.S. families are still reeling from the recent recession; between B) bounced back from its 2002 low, U.S. families are still reeling from the recent recession, from C) has bounced back from its 2002 low, U.S. families are still reeling from the recent recession; between D) has bounced back from its 2002 low, U.S. families are still reeling from the recent recession; from E) bounced back from its 2002 low, U.S. families are still reeling from the recent recession; from
I was able to quickly narrow down the options between D and E, but then got confused. I read the official explanation. It says, if one sentence is in past then next sentence should also be in past. I undertand that that is totally based on the context. However, in this case, at least to me, even E looked ok - in fact better :). Please explain the tense switch.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
spandey1982
|
Post subject: Re: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:54 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 6
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
anoo.anand
|
Post subject: Re: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:18 pm |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 73
|
|
What is the OA ??
to me it should be 'D'
> has is needed...to show the comparison....WHILE.... etc etc...
From ...to ... is needed... idiom.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
gorav.s
|
Post subject: Re: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:19 am |
|
 |
| Course Students |
|
|
Posts: 25
|
|
It is clearly D = Answer.
You need to sense the main tense of the sentence. Second part says - "US families are still reeling" - present tense .
hence The whole sentence shall be in present tense -- " has bounced back....." in this case present prefect.
Just think about E-- stock market bounced .....= past, ---> then families are stil reeling .... => present tense , does not make sence and meaning clear. = wrong.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:29 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 7146
|
gorav.s wrote: It is clearly D = Answer.
You need to sense the main tense of the sentence. Second part says - "US families are still reeling" - present tense .
hence The whole sentence shall be in present tense -- " has bounced back....." in this case present prefect.
Just think about E-- stock market bounced .....= past, ---> then families are stil reeling .... => present tense , does not make sence and meaning clear. = wrong. this is a great explanation.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
k.tishutina
|
Post subject: Re: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:38 pm |
|
 |
| Course Students |
|
|
Posts: 1
|
|
I think main clue here is the word "while", this word should indicate that to actions are happening in the same time period.
I am doing X, while she is doing Y.
I was doing X, while she was doing Y.
So, "bounced" cant be right here, since families ARE..."
Got this Q wrong, but now see the reason why D is the BEST here.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jnelson0612
|
Post subject: Re: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:05 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 1857
|
|
Nice observation k.tishutina.
_________________ Jamie Nelson ManhattanGMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hannes.rainer
|
Post subject: Re: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:59 pm |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 1
|
|
I think there is one more approach to his problem, other than using "while": 1.) ..from its 2002 low.. so this must be "has bounced back" as it states a period of time since 2002 --> C or D 2.) between 2001 to 2004 is wrong (betweend x AND y), hence it's D
Is assumption 1.) correct?
BG
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jnelson0612
|
Post subject: Re: SC: Stock market bounced back Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:27 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 1857
|
|
hannes, I can go with that! :-) Nice when we are all in agreement.
_________________ Jamie Nelson ManhattanGMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|