OK, let’s take a simple sentence and bisect it.
I like to read Archaeology books and I love to watch movies of Dinosaur, a reptile that lived in Jurassic age.
Independent Clause1 # I like to read Archaelogy books
Coordinate Conjuction # and
Independent Clause2 # I love to watch movies of Dinosaur
Modifier (adjective) # reptile
Restrictive Clause # that lived in Jurassic age
That is a relative pronoun referring to reptile.
So, in this structure restrictive clause tells us about the reptiles that lived in Jurassic age. There might be other reptiles but it restricts us to only those reptiles that lived in Jurassic age.
Combining all the last three elements ( highlighted in Red) DOES NOT means one big clause. It is just one thing modifying another thing which is again modified.
In the original sentence (Answer Choice B):
Independent Clause 1# Computers are becoming faster, more powerful, and more reliable
Coordinate Conjunction # and
Independent Clause 2# so too are modems
Modifier # the devices
Relative Clause (or more specifically restrictive Clause) # that allow two or more computers to share information over regular telephone lines.
Combining last three elements do not make a one big clause.
As a matter a matter of fact you can have a series of dependent clause modifying one thing after other OR modifying the same thing.
OK, let’s take a look into this sentence:
I would like to buy a 19 inch TV and I would like to buy iPOD, the music player that adds to my collection of cool electronic gadgets, one of my favorite hobbies.
Independent Clause # 1: I would like to buy a 19 inch TV
Independent Clause # 2: I would like to buy iPOD
Modifier 1 # the music player
Relative Clause # that adds to my collection of cool electronic gadgets.
Modifier 2 # One of my favorite hobbies
Modifying 2# (One of my favorite hobbies) is modifying the idea: collection of electronic gadgets” and telling that this “collection of electronic gadgets “is my hobby.
Modifier 1 # the music player is modifying the iPOD.
Hope that makes sense!
Anonymous wrote:
Thanks for the explanation Mridul, but my question is still unanswered. In context of this sentence and your explanation,
we know the comma splice has not been corrected by either replacing the comma with a period or by a semi-colon.
Are you saying the co-ordinating conjunction or sub-ordinating conjunction is used to combine the two clauses? If yes, what is the conjunction used here?
I believe - removing 'are' from the original clause, converts it into a phrase.
Can anyone/instructors explain?
Thanks