Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 2 of 2 [ 23 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:16 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 14
Can we have an example when 'Though he has had ' is correct ?
That might put things into perspective.

This one tough to understand.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 10:20 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2412
patil.ambar wrote:
Can we have an example when 'Though he has had ' is correct ?
That might put things into perspective.

This one tough to understand.


Though he has had substantial success, he knows that he must continue to work hard to keep building his business.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:05 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 187
OE for choices E and D say that - Having had/ Having achieved are acceptable forms of past perfect construction.

I don't understand this point. can you please explain this alternative form of past perfect constriction used in choices D and E. Although I do understand that D and E are both wrong.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 8:09 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 76
jnelson0612 wrote:
Though he has had substantial success, he knows that he must continue to work hard to keep building his business.

hi Jamie: your example seems very appealing for a combination of present perfect and simple present, but i'm having trouble convincing myself w/ the occurrence of two (or more) PRESENT events. surely, we can have an infinite series of PAST (as well as FUTURE) events, but is it possible to have more than one instance of PRESENT? unless events occur simultaneously (in parallel), in which case you do not need "HAS HAD", i think, there can only be ONE instance of PRESENT. the only way i can imagine this is if something happened in the past and its effect still continues in the PRESENT. sorry, if i appear confused and too convoluted.

Thanks.

_________________
Ashish
Share not just why the right answer is right, but also why the wrong ones are not.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2412
as2764 wrote:
jnelson0612 wrote:
Though he has had substantial success, he knows that he must continue to work hard to keep building his business.

hi Jamie: your example seems very appealing for a combination of present perfect and simple present, but i'm having trouble convincing myself w/ the occurrence of two (or more) PRESENT events. surely, we can have an infinite series of PAST (as well as FUTURE) events, but is it possible to have more than one instance of PRESENT? unless events occur simultaneously (in parallel), in which case you do not need "HAS HAD", i think, there can only be ONE instance of PRESENT. the only way i can imagine this is if something happened in the past and its effect still continues in the PRESENT. sorry, if i appear confused and too convoluted.

Thanks.


Ashish, I'm going to need your help here. :-)

So you are okay with my use of present perfect and simple present? I have changed my mind on this a few times as I've read your response. :-)

I agree that two present events are probably going to need a parallel structure. I keep putting potential sentences together in my head and they all involve parallel markers such as "yet, while, and", etc.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:32 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 76
Jamie, sorry for the late response. not sure why i didn't get a notification of your reply in my inbox :(
jnelson0612 wrote:
Ashish, I'm going to need your help here. :-)

So you are okay with my use of present perfect and simple present? I have changed my mind on this a few times as I've read your response. :-)

YES, i agree w/ your example in which:
-the subject had attained success in the PAST and continues to enjoy (the effect of) the success in the PRESENT.
-he knows (in the PRESENT) he must continue to work hard.

:) since my query appears to be see-sawing between agreement and disagreement, i'll try to use some basic historical examples here.

ex. 1:
1776 - USA's independence
1914 - start of world war I
1939 - start of world war II
1947 - India's independence

"world war I had occurred before world war II did."

when observed on an imaginary timeline, we can have infinite # of PAST (and FUTURE) events where PAST PERFECT (and FUTURE PERFECT) does justice.
jnelson0612 wrote:
I agree that two present events are probably going to need a parallel structure. I keep putting potential sentences together in my head and they all involve parallel markers such as "yet, while, and", etc.

i recall reading the MGMAT SC guide, and i know exactly what you mean by these exceptions to the PERFECT tense rule in general!

BUT, if you imagine a similar timeline i mentioned above for some PRESENT events, how can we write them in a sentence?

ex. 2:
July 30, 2012 - on-going Syrian war
July 30, 2012 - on-going Olympic games
July 30, 2012 - on-going electoral campaign for US Presidential elections

i ain't suggesting the "start" of the above events, but the current state of these.

appreciate your thoughts. thanks!

_________________
Ashish
Share not just why the right answer is right, but also why the wrong ones are not.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:38 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4462
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
i don't think your question is sufficiently specific. if we want to write a sentence about them, you should specify what you want to know about these events in the sentence..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 1
Hi,

I have just one doubt. 'Had' is used here as a main verb. But why is these sentences wrong :- "He had success", "I have the box with me" . In these 2 sentences, 'had/have' is followed by a noun. So are they wrong. If so, then why ?


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 2 of 2 [ 23 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: