priyankamittal wrote:
Hi Ron,
I read and re-read your explanation a couple of times, but did not understand the reasoning for the correct answer.
Please explain what is wrong is the line of thought written below:
GMAT, as I've read in your previous posts is very particular on antecedents for pronouns.
The first "its"- possessive pronoun refers back to the to new restaurant as that is the closest noun. The 2nd "its" then should also refer back to the same noun- the new restaurant. However this would distort the meaning as the rest of the sentence refers to the main restaurant.
In choosing C, I was bringing the noun closer to the object of the sentence presuming the first part of the sentence to be the modifier.
Please explain where am I going wrong.
Thanks
first, there is absolutely no rule stating that nouns lying
closer to a pronoun are more likely to be considered antecedents. where'd you get that "rule"?
second, the gmat is rather inconsistent on the issue of pronoun ambiguity, as i've noted in several places. see here, for instance:
post35595.html#p35595...so picking based on pronoun ambiguity is a VERY bad idea, unless you literally can't think of
any other criterion on which to split.
third, we HAVE noticed the following trend:
objects of prepositions are unlikely to be chosen as antecedents of pronouns, unless the pronoun itself is also the object of a preposition.
here, "country" is the object of the preposition "across", and so is much less likely to be considered the antecedent.