zaarathelab wrote:
The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics designed for undergraduate students in a two-year course.
A. The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics designed for
undergraduate students in a two-year course.
B. For undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a two-year course, being a comprehensive
introduction to modern physics.
C. A comprehensive introduction was in a two-year course by the physicist Richard Feynman presenting to
undergraduate students an introduction to modern physics.
D. Presenting a comprehensive introduction, the physicist Richard Feynman introduced modern physics in a two-year
course designed for undergraduate students.
E. In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a
comprehensive introduction to modern physics.
OA is E
Doesn't E suggest that the richard feynman was contained in a 2 year course?
Shouldn't it be -
In a 2 year course......, a comprehensive introduction to modern physics was presented by Richard Feynman?
Here is the way which always holds in modifier questions...place WHO / WHAT before the modifier....
Op E: WHO In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students...??? ... the physicist Richard
OR
WHAT In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students...??? ....the physicist Richard presented something..---> a clause
Hence i believe that in both the cases the modifier is well placed.
Hope this helps..:)