Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 2 [ 16 posts ] Go to page 1, 2  Next



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:04 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 5
The answer to the problem #4 in Foundations of GMAT Verbal on p. 217 is probably wrong because explanation of this answer tells totally the opposite:

The problem: Reaearchers have noted that panda bears that have given birth to live young live longer in the wild. Therefore, these researchers have concluded that giving birth to live young increases a panda's lifespan.

The argument makes which of the following assumptions?

The answer: (C) Pandas that are already likely to live longer are also more likely to give birth to live young.

The explanation from the book: Answer (C) is correct. The author assumes that the causality does not run the other way - that having the qualities leading to a long lifespan doesn't cause pandas to be more likely to give birth to live young.

Doesn't the explanation contradict the answer (C)?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:29 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 706
I can't seem to find the question that you are referring to. Check the page and problem number again, or if you're looking at the digital version of our books, make sure to mention the chapter number as the pages are slightly off.

_________________
Joe Lucero
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:00 pm 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 1
The book is "Foundations of GMAT Verbal" (Fifth Edition). It's in Chapter 11: Putting It All Together, the final section, "Critical Reasoning 'Hints' Drill", question #4, on pages 216-217. The answer is on page 226.

Either I'm a big dumbie, or this is an error... as the "correct" assumption directly contradicts the question's argument/conclusion.

And, as noted above, the answer section is even more confusing, as it explicitly says, correctly, that the question's argument/conclusion assumes "A --> B", not "B --> A", and then in literally the next sentence, says, but gosh, "B --> A" sure is a good argument, though... when the point of the question seems to be: "find an assumption that supports A --> B".


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:23 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4406
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
i don't believe there is a "fifth edition" of this book, but i have managed to track down chapter 11 "putting it all together", which starts on page 179 of my book. however, the problem you mention does not appear anywhere in that chapter. can you perhaps scan the page of the book where you think the question is (along with the solution) and email to to me so i can have a look and figure out where we aren't understanding each other? my email address is tsanders at manhattanprep.com

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:37 pm 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 5
Hi Tim,

I'm looking at the 5th edition right now... And I also don't understand why answer C is correct.

Argument: "Researches have noted that panda bears that have given birth to live young live longer in the wild. Therefore, these researches have concluded that giving birth to live young increases a panda's lifespan"

Question: "The argument makes which of the following assumptions?"

Answer (C): "Pandas that are already likely to live longer are also more likely to give birth to live young"

Can you please explain how C could possibly be the correct answer? It completely contracdicts the conclusion!

Thanks,
piti


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:40 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4406
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
still waiting for someone to scan the page and email it to me. i'm not trying to be difficult, i just DON'T HAVE this information and cannot help you until i do..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:36 pm 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 5
Hi Tim,

It doesn't allow me to send you an e-mail nor to attached the scanned file.

Thanks,
Piti


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:59 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2391
piti wrote:
Hi Tim,

It doesn't allow me to send you an e-mail nor to attached the scanned file.

Thanks,
Piti


Hi,
I too have just carefully read each page of chapter 11 of the Foundations of Verbal book and I don't see this problem anywhere. Unless someone else can give us a different location for this problem I'm afraid that we can't do anything else. I'm really sorry.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:51 pm 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 5
Hi,

Foundations of GMAT verbal, Chapter 11, page 216, Question #4.

I'll be glad to send you a scan of the pages if you send me a mail with your e-mail.

Thanks,
Piti


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:14 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4406
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
read the thread.

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 3
Hi All,

Here is a scan:
http://tinypic.com/r/fl8p6t/6


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:28 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4406
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
thanks for that pic. strange that it did not include a page number, so the mystery continues. i also do not have a solution scanned, but my guess is on question 4 they just forgot to put the word "not" in front of "also"..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 8:07 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 3
Hi Tim,

Thanks for the quick response. It makes sense.

Happy New Year!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:49 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4406
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
glad it made sense to you. i'm still puzzled about why the problem doesn't show up in my book, but whatever.. :)

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Researchers have noted that panda bears...
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:18 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 19
Is there a mistake in this questions.I cant seem to figure out why the correct answer is c.
I think c is wrong-the closest right answer I though of is A-Its removing a cause that might reduce the lifespan of panda's.
The problem is on page 217 qs 4 from the FOV book.


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 2 [ 16 posts ] Go to page 1, 2  Next





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron