looks like you're making a mistaken assumption here:
Guet wrote:
Since ther are 10 men and of the 12 jurors to be selected 8 wil have to be men ((2/3)*(12)=
the problem asks for the probability that AT LEAST 8 jurors will be male. you have only calculated the probability that EXACTLY 8 jurors will be male.
in particular, if you're going to use this sort of direct approach, you have to consider the possibilities in which MORE than 8 jurors will be male: 9 male/3 female, or 10 male/2 female. (there's no need to consider 11+ male, because there are only 10 males in the pool.)
Quote:
Obviously, this was a trap and I fell for it. I still don't know what I did wrong. I kind of understand the only way to get less than 8 is to get 7 men... but not really.
when you use the (1 - x) deal, you need to find the probability of the
opposite event. since the event under consideration is "at least 8 males", the opposite event is "
fewer than 8 males".
now technically, this would encompass all kinds of possibilities: 7m/5f, 6m/6f, 5m/7f, ..., all the way down to 0m/12f. but the only one of these that's possible in the first place is 7m/5f, because
there are only 5 females in the pool in the first place. therefore, you don't consider the possibilities with 6+ females, because they're impossible.
Quote:
Can you explain this to me? Pretend I am a 1st grader and start from the beginning please! Thank you!
that'd be one smart first-grader.
mm-hmm