erpriyankabishnoi wrote:
British historians have sometimes cited financial concerns as the primary cause of the American Revolution, but in doing so, the ideals of the 18th century French Enlightenment are not given their due.
a) doing so, the ideals of the 18th century French Enlightenment are not given their due
b) doing it, the ideals of the 18th century French Enlightenment are not given their due
c) doing so, the ideals of the 18th century French Enlightenment have not been given their due
d) doing so, they do not give the ideals of the 18th century French Enlightenment their due
e) doing so, they do not give the due of their ideals to the French Enlightenment of the 18th century
Sure! Here would be my process:
1) I see a 4/1 split on "doing it" vs. "doing so". What is it supposed to be referring to? "Doing so" is the preferred idiom. Cross off B.
2) There is a nice split on "the ideals" vs. "they". Look at the the phrase "but in doing so,". Who is that describing? The historians, so either the word "historians" or "they" (pronoun referring to historians) must follow that phrase. Cross off A and C.
3) Compare D and E. Which one is worded correctly? Let's compare:
D) they do not give the ideals ("of . . ." prep phrase) their due
E) they do not give the due ("of . . ." starts off three prepositional phrases)
D must be correct. "They do not give the ideals their due" vs. "they do not give the due". E doesn't even make sense, and it's especially clear when we strip out the prepositions.