Which of the following is most strongly suggested about U.S. employers of Mexican immigrants?
(a) Most of these employers pay illegal Mexican immigrants less money than they pay legal Mexican immigrants.
(b) Some of these employers either violate or are exempt from wage laws.
(c) Without Mexican immigrants, some of these employers would be forced to close their businesses.
(d) Most of these companies employ Mexican immigrants in order to lower their costs and, therefore, increase their profits.
(e) The majority of these employers prefer to hire immigrants for low-paying jobs rather than U.S. citizens.

As per Manhattan, the correct answer is (b) however the passage clearly states "These workers, many of whom leave economically depressed villages in the Mexican interior, [b]are often willing to work for wages well below both the U.S. minimum wage and the poverty line" and says nothing whether US employers breach the law by paying them lower wages than the minimum wage limit. Could you please help clarify my query.

Hi,
Please post the entire RC passage so we can help you.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor

For years, employers in the United States have counted on a steady flow of laborers from Mexico willing to accept low-skilled, low paying jobs. These workers, many of whom leave economically depressed villages in the Mexican interior, are often willing to work for wages well below both the U.S. minimum wage and the poverty line. A dramatic demographic shift currently taking place in Mexico, however, may alter the trend: the stream of workers migrating from Mexico to the United States might one day greatly diminish if not cease.
As a result of a decades-long family planning campaign, population growth, which had reached a peak of 3.5% in 1965, declined to just 1% by 2005. On average, Mexican women today are giving birth to fewer than half as many children as did their mothers. The campaign, organized around the slogan that “the small family lives better,” saw the Mexican government establish family-planning clinics and offer free contraception. For nearly three decades, the government’s message concerning population has not wavered. In fact, the Mexican Senate recently voted to expand public school sex education programs to kindergarten.
For two primary reasons, Mexico’s new demographics could greatly impact the number of Mexicans seeking work in the U.S. First, smaller families directly limit the pool of potential migrants. Second, the slowing of Mexico’s population growth has fostered hope that Mexico will develop a healthy middle class. Though the former of these factors is all but assured, the growth of a healthy middle class is far from a foregone conclusion. The critical challenge for Mexico is what it does with the next 20 years. Developing a stable middle class will require investments in education, job training, and infrastructure, as well as a social-security system to protect its aging population. Businesses will need to create more semi-skilled and skilled jobs in construction, manufacturing, and technology, as well as the associated “white collar” jobs that too many Mexican manufacturers currently locate outside of the country’s borders. It remains to be seen whether government and industry will answer these challenges as vigorously as the family-planning campaign answered the problem of population growth.

For years, employers in the United States have counted on a steady flow of laborers from Mexico willing to accept low-skilled, low paying jobs. These workers, many of whom leave economically depressed villages in the Mexican interior, are often willing to work for wages well below both the U.S. minimum wage and the poverty line. A dramatic demographic shift currently taking place in Mexico, however, may alter the trend: the stream of workers migrating from Mexico to the United States might one day greatly diminish if not cease.
As a result of a decades-long family planning campaign, population growth, which had reached a peak of 3.5% in 1965, declined to just 1% by 2005. On average, Mexican women today are giving birth to fewer than half as many children as did their mothers. The campaign, organized around the slogan that “the small family lives better,” saw the Mexican government establish family-planning clinics and offer free contraception. For nearly three decades, the government’s message concerning population has not wavered. In fact, the Mexican Senate recently voted to expand public school sex education programs to kindergarten.
For two primary reasons, Mexico’s new demographics could greatly impact the number of Mexicans seeking work in the U.S. First, smaller families directly limit the pool of potential migrants. Second, the slowing of Mexico’s population growth has fostered hope that Mexico will develop a healthy middle class. Though the former of these factors is all but assured, the growth of a healthy middle class is far from a foregone conclusion. The critical challenge for Mexico is what it does with the next 20 years. Developing a stable middle class will require investments in education, job training, and infrastructure, as well as a social-security system to protect its aging population. Businesses will need to create more semi-skilled and skilled jobs in construction, manufacturing, and technology, as well as the associated “white collar” jobs that too many Mexican manufacturers currently locate outside of the country’s borders. It remains to be seen whether government and industry will answer these challenges as vigorously as the family-planning campaign answered the problem of population growth.

Of course the passage doesn’t SAY the employers are breaking the law; that’s why the question is asking which one is most strongly SUGGESTED. Immigrants are working, they are willing to accept illegally low wages, it is reasonable to conclude that employers may be paying lower than minimum wage. You do not have to be convinced that this is happening; you just have to be convinced that none of the other answer choices are MORE likely..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Thanks Tim, makes sense.

awesome; glad to hear it..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Tim, i am still not convinced that ans should not be between C or D. i thought that we should not assume or infer things out of the passage.

You absolutely should logically infer things out of the passage. In fact, some of the questions in RC are in fact inference questions. Don't hesitate to draw logical conclusions that are supported by the facts of the passage.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor