![]() |
| Prime Confusion |
|
mdhamil
Guest
|
The problem is, you don't have 3 twos as prime factors, you only have two.
Primes of 12: 2,2,3 Primes of 10: 2,5 You don't know for sure if the "2" in the primes of 10 is also one of the "2"s in the primes of 12. So all you can say for sure is the primes are 2,2,3,5. Mike |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Rey Fernandez
MGMAT STAFF
|
I find using the phrase "at least" helps for these problems.
If we are told that j is divisible by 12, then that means that j has at least two 2s and one 3 in its prime box. There could be other prime factors in j, including some more 2s and 3s, but we're not sure about them. Similarly, j is divisible by 10 tells us that there are at least one 2 and one 5 in j's prime box. If you combine the evidence, then what's the most that we can say about the number of 2s that must be in j's prime box? Well, what can you accurately conclude if you combine "j has at least two 2s in its prime box" with "j has at least one 2 in its prime box?" The most you could say with certainty is that j has at least two 2s in its prime box. Rey |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Prime Confusion |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.

