| Author |
Message |
|
guessmeguy
|
Post subject: Re: Re: Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:57 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 3
|
RonPurewal wrote: agendra1003 wrote: A very basic question ..how will I identify that a word is used as a 'participle' or past tense verb.....Do I just have to consider the function it performs..or are there any other rules??? Thx in advance... let's say you have "X VERBed", and you're wondering whether "VERBed" is a participle or a past-tense verb. * if you can answer "did X VERB?" with a yes, then it's a past tense verb. * if you can answer "did someone/something VERB X?" with a yes, then it's a past tense verb. examples: the speaker dedicated her speech to her late father"did the speaker dedicate something?" --> yes "did someone dedicate the speaker?" --> no hence, past tense verb the speech dedicated to Mr. Smith was very long"did the speech dedicate something?" --> no "did someone dedicate the speech?" --> yes hence, participle hope that helps Hi Ron, I guess that was a typo? I believe you meant participle. Cheers, Sheva
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
saptadeepc
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:41 pm |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 55
|
FANCHEN wrote: The bones of Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur that is a distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembles South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered in Madagascar. (A) The bones of Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur that is a distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembles South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered in Madagascar. (B) The bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, a distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and with a close resemblance to South American predatory dinosaurs, has been discovered in Madagascar. (C) In Madagascar, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembled South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered. (D) A distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex, bearing a close resemblance to South American predatory dinosaurs is Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur, the bones of which have been discovered in Madagascar. (E) A distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembling South American predatory dinosaurs, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, have been discovered in Madagascar.
THE OA is A, why not C? Modifiers set within comma are not essential to the meaning of the sentence and can be struck off without hampering the meaning. Let's give C a thought on this (C) In Madagascar, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembled South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered. C can be changed to a sentence written in bold without changing the meaning, but does it make sense ? NO Therefore it could be struck off from probables
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:02 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 7146
|
saptadeepc wrote: Modifiers set within comma are not essential to the meaning of the sentence and can be struck off without hampering the meaning. Let's give C a thought on this
(C) In Madagascar, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembled South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered.
C can be changed to a sentence written in bold without changing the meaning, but does it make sense ? NO
Therefore it could be struck off from probables this analysis is incorrect. both "Majungatholus atopus" and "distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembled South American predatory dinosaurs" are modifiers, so the resulting sentence is just “the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur have been discovered.” the problem with that choice lies in "resembled", which is used as if it were a participle, but isn't actually a participle.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sushmit
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:40 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 3
|
|
B can noway be correct. has refers back to bones --> incorrect. But why not D.what is wrong with D?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
nonameee
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:20 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 68
|
|
I am also wondering about the use of tenses:
How can a dinosaur, an extinct animal, resemble anyone (present simple)? I would say that past simple is a more logical choice.
Thanks
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:42 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 7146
|
nonameee wrote: I am also wondering about the use of tenses:
How can a dinosaur, an extinct animal, resemble anyone (present simple)? I would say that past simple is a more logical choice.
Thanks despite its name, the “present tense” doesn't necessarily have to talk about things that are true in the present. if something is a permanent or timeless truth, then the present tense is appropriate to express it. in this particular context, either the present tense or the past tense may be justified, depending on the author's intent. if the author wants to emphasize the fact that the two dinosaurs literally resembled one another when they were alive -- and if there were actually a timeframe in which both existed -- then the past tense would make sense. on the other hand, if the author just wants to point out an anatomical resemblance without confining it to a particular timeframe or historical setting, than the present tense makes sense.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
nonameee
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:02 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 68
|
|
Ron, thanks a lot for your explanation.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 7:08 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 7146
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
davetzulin
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:45 pm |
|
 |
| Forum Guests |
|
|
Posts: 130
|
|
Ron,
Is it Ok for me to strike these answer choices this way?
(C) In Madagascar, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembled South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered.
the two bolded items are modifying "dinosaur" in sequence. but one is an appositive and one is a participle; therefore it is not parallel. It'd be the same as writing:
the dinosaur, Majungatholus and distantly related to Trex, is big.
(D) A distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex, bearing a close resemblance to South American predatory dinosaurs is Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur, the bones of which have been discovered in Madagascar.
underlined: i see a subj/verb inversion, and when i invert it back i see "majungatholus atopus" being modified by an appositive and comma + verb-ing.
bolded: this looks like a bad version of an absolute phrase, where the absolute phrase does not properly modify the preceding clause.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:51 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 7146
|
|
dave, your heart is in the right place -- that is to say, you've identified the correct type of error -- but you haven't classified the minutiae of that error correctly.
in the erroneous version that you cited, the first part is an adjective-style modifier (participle). however, the second part is actually a verb, so you've got a serious problem on your hands. in other words, “resembled” would only make sense here as an actual verb, as in This dinosaur resembled that other dinosaur.
you can't put verbs in parallel to things that are not verbs, so there is your issue.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
davetzulin
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:52 pm |
|
 |
| Forum Guests |
|
|
Posts: 130
|
RonPurewal wrote: dave, your heart is in the right place -- that is to say, you've identified the correct type of error -- but you haven't classified the minutiae of that error correctly.
in the erroneous version that you cited, the first part is an adjective-style modifier (participle). however, the second part is actually a verb, so you've got a serious problem on your hands. in other words, “resembled” would only make sense here as an actual verb, as in This dinosaur resembled that other dinosaur.
you can't put verbs in parallel to things that are not verbs, so there is your issue. thanks Ron I totally missed the second half of that modifier! thanks for pointing that out.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: PREP2 SC:The bones of Majungatholus atopus Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 4:17 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 7146
|
|
 |
|
 |
|