![]() |
| statements never contractdict each other |
|
KTsincere
Guest
|
Hey Raeesebrahim,
This is just a case of not reading the question carefully... Statement (2) states that n+2 is the first of three consectuvie integers whose PRODUCT is 990. You just switched PRODUCT for SUM... So your calculations would have been correct if it is said "... whose SUM is 990" Since the product is 990 your formula should be (n+2)(n+3)(n+4)=990... Since the number is close to 1000 you should start be checking the product of consecutive integers around the number 10. Since 10*10*10=1000 Ex: 9*10*11=990 N+2=9 N=7 Hope it helps... KT |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
|
that's right. if you don't think of the idea of checking consecutive integers in the neighborhood of 10*10*10 (which is also the fastest way i can think of), you can always factor 990 into primes, as you'd probably do in any other situation with products/factors/multiples: 990 = 99 * 10 = 33 * 3 * 10 = 2 * 3 * 3 * 5 * 11 once you have this factorization, it's easy to figure out the numbers, since 11 clearly must be one of them. the other prime factors - 2 * 3 * 3 * 5 - can be regrouped into 9 * 10, so there you have it: 9 * 10 * 11. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| statements never contractdict each other |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.

