![]() |
| DS - confusing one |
| whats the answer? |
|
blogger
Guest
|
Question 1)
1 is not a prime number. Questions 2) statement 2 is same as the original 4x + 5y = 0 Is the answer A |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Guest
|
in the second one
a + b can be zero in 2 cases.... either a and b are zeros or one is the negative of the other. Y is the 1st possibility not taken? |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Guest
Guest
|
First Qn:
1) ANS C With Statement 1, we can infer that, x could be any value between 1 and 9, whereas prime number could be, 3,5,7 It is insufficient to answer the qn With Statement 2, X is a multiple of P, we can infer that, P can be 2,3,5,7,9 and X could be any value between 1 to 9 Combining both the statments we are left with P as 3 and X as 9 (because other prime numbers can not be a multiple of X, and less than the value of X) Thus the entire series can be divisible by the same prime number, ie, 3 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
|
consider the different values of X, all but one which give sequences** that are multiples of a common factor.
X = 1: no common factor X = 2: p could be 2 X = 3: p could be 3 X = 4: p could be 2 or 4 X = 5: p could be 5 X = 6: p could be 2 or 3 X = 7: p could be 7 X = 8: p could be 2 X = 9: p could be 3 (1) if p is 3, then the answer is yes if x = 9, but no if x = 7. therefore, insufficient. (2) all such combinations of x and p appear in the above list, making the answer 'yes'. (in fact, it's trivial to see that, if p goes into x, it must also go into xx, xxx, ...) therefore, sufficient. since (2) is sufficient and (1) is not, we don't need to consider the statements together. remember that this is data sufficiency; all we have to be able to do is answer the yes/no question. we DO NOT have to be able to deduce unique values for x and p to be 'sufficient' (a mistake made by at least one poster on this thread). |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Re: DS - confusing one |
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
|
remember that you're interested in the SUM 4x + 5y, so you should try to rearrange the data you're given to create this sum. (1) no information about x, so obviously insufficient. (the answer is 'yes' if x = 0 and 'no' if x is any other value.) (2) add 10y to both sides: 8x + 10y = 0 divide by 2: 4x + 5y = 0 yes sufficient since the problem asks about the combination 4x + 5y, you should IMMEDIATELY make the adjustments made to statement (2) here, in an effort to create that expression on one side of the equation. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| DS - confusing one |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.

