![]() |
| OG verbal review #93 |
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
|
As far as the 'it' goes:
* At best, it's redundant (there's no shift in the subject, so there's no need for an additional useless pronoun). And we all know how the GMAT feels about redundancy. * At worst, it creates bad parallelism between the two segments of the 'and'-compound: has moved away from the Spanish classics and now it draws on the works... Since the first part of this parallel pair lacks a pronoun, the second shouldn't have one either. My least favorite part of choice A is 'the works both of...', which is awkward if not downright wrong. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| OG verbal review #93 |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.

