Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 2 [ 22 posts ] Go to page 1, 2  Next



 
Author Message
 Post subject: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 12:19 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 9
Though he had had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves, Howard Stern opted out of terrestrial broadcasting in favor of the less regulated satellite radio medium.
a) Though he had had
b)Though he has had
c) Even though he had
d) Having had
e) Having achieved

The answr is a).

My doubt : Why is c) not correct answer ?

When to use "had had" and when to use "had"?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4404
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
Replace the verb "had" with "earned" and you'll see it immediately. We need a past perfect verb in the first half of the sentence, since the second half happens after the first but still in the past. Past perfect verbs usually include "had" along with a past participle. The confusing thing here is that the past participle is also the word "had"; but we do need both of them because they serve two different purposes..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:16 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 7
Tim,
Can you elaborate on your explanation by using an example?

Thanks


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:11 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4404
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
Before i had success as a Manhattan GMAT instructor, i had had success taking the GMAT..

i would prefer to replace the non-past perfect instances of "had" with "experienced" in the sentence above, but the sentence as written works and hopefully helps you see when each construction would be used..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:38 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 76
thanks Tim, your explanation is great. replacing the 2nd had with either earned or experienced explains things well.

i chose C as the answer and only other thing i don't get in the answer explanations is that 'even though' is wordy. even and though are very commonly used together, despite having the same meaning.

what is your GMAT perspective on this?

_________________
Ashish
Share not just why the right answer is right, but also why the wrong ones are not.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:57 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2390
as2764 wrote:
thanks Tim, your explanation is great. replacing the 2nd had with either earned or experienced explains things well.

i chose C as the answer and only other thing i don't get in the answer explanations is that 'even though' is wordy. even and though are very commonly used together, despite having the same meaning.

what is your GMAT perspective on this?


I think the perspective would be that the "even" is unnecessary so just go with "though". "Even" doesn't add anything of importance to the sentence. It's yet another one of those times that your ear is not that helpful, since I agree that "even though" is more commonly used in spoken communication than "though".

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:17 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 76
sounds good, Jamie. thanks

_________________
Ashish
Share not just why the right answer is right, but also why the wrong ones are not.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 7:16 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2390
Good, you are welcome.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 3:23 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 48
I found searched this thread on the forum, and I am still a little confused as to why the answer is A.

If had is used for the double past, then Howard Stern's success happened before he opted out.

One thing (Stern's success) happened in the past, before another thing in the past (opting out for satelite radio). Is that not the double past?

Thanks


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 4:06 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 320
Hi Milanproda,

Not sure I fully understand your doubts. Please post back if you require more clarification.

The use of past perfect here is to show the timeline of two past events. Past perfect is used for the event that happened first - "success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves". Simple Past is used for the event that happened after the first event - "opted out of terrestrial broadcasting in favor of the less regulated satellite radio medium"

Milanproda wrote:
If had is used for the double past, then Howard Stern's success happened before he opted out.

I am assuming that when you say double past, then you are referring to an earlier event in the past with reference to a later event also in the past.

Milanproda wrote:
One thing (Stern's success) happened in the past, before another thing in the past (opting out for satelite radio). Is that not the double past?

I will explain this using a fictional time reference:

    1939: Stern had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves
    1943: Stern opted out of terrestrial broadcasting in favor of the less regulated satellite radio medium

To refer to both these events in a single sentence, we need the use of past perfect to show that the first event took place before the second but both of them were in the past.

Hope this helps

Regards

Sunil


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:23 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 48
Sunil,

Thanks a bunch for your response.

Here is what I do not understand: Howard Stern HAD success, and OPTED out. Wouldn't one had be enough to show that his success came before his opting out? Why the two hads?

I realize I am wrong here, I just want to understand the reasoning so I don't get hooked the next time I get run into a question like this.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 3:41 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 320
Hey,

No problem.

I understand your doubt now and it is a good question. The answer is in Tim's first post:
tim wrote:
Replace the verb "had" with "earned" and you'll see it immediately. We need a past perfect verb in the first half of the sentence, since the second half happens after the first but still in the past. Past perfect verbs usually include "had" along with a past participle. The confusing thing here is that the past participle is also the word "had"; but we do need both of them because they serve two different purposes.


"Success" is not playing the part of a verb, in fact I think it is a noun.

Hope this helps

Regards

Sunil


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 12:13 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2390
Thanks Sunil!

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 4:51 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 4
Thanks everyone for the elaborate discussion.I was not clear why "had had" is correct in the sentence.I stand corrected now.

Cheers,
Rohan


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC : Howard Stern
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:57 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2390
Great to hear!

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 2 [ 22 posts ] Go to page 1, 2  Next





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron