 | OG SC #32 |  |
|
AB
Guest
|
 |
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:21 pm |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
The commerce department announced that the economy grew during the second quater at a 7.5 percent annual rate, while the inflation eased when it might have been expected for it to rise.
A) it might have been expected for it to rise
B) it might have been expected to rise
C) it might have been expected that it should rise
D) its rise might have been expected
E) there might have been an expectation it would rise
OA is B. But I couldn't understand what is the problem with choice D.
Thanks,
Aishwary
|
|
|
 |
 | |  |
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
| Joined: 08 Oct 2007 |
| Posts: 1476 |
|
|
 |
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:21 am |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
The main issue here is lack of parallelism. 'Inflation' is a plain noun - and we're continuing to talk about inflation - so it's most logically parallel to continue the sentence in a manner that continues to address 'inflation' itself (or the equivalent pronoun 'it', which is what the correct answer does). Choice D unnecessarily switches the subject to 'its rise', creating a nonparallel construction that's also (arguably) more difficult to understand.
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
|
|
|
|
Powered by
phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.