Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: If set S consists of the numbers 1, 5, -2, 8, and n,
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:12 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 1
If set S consists of the numbers 1, 5, -2, 8, and n, is 0< n< 7?

(1) The median of the numbers in S is less than 5.
(2) The median of the numbers in S is greater than 1.

Source: GMatPrepTest
OA = C

I chose D because of this thought process:
I rearrange set S to: -2, 1, 5, 8 then where can I put n?

from (1), n has to be between 1 and 5-. So 1<n<5- --> SUFF

from (2), n has to be between 1+ and 5, So 1+<n<5 --> SUFF

Can someone please help where I go wrong?

Thanks


Top 
 Post subject: Re: If set S consists of the numbers 1, 5, -2, 8, and n,
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:28 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 170
The median is defined as the central value( after arranging data in ascending/descending order).

eg: 1,5,45 ----Here the median is 5
eg: -82,-15,45---Here the median is -15

Coming to the problem..
v_leonardo wrote:
I rearrange set S to: -2, 1, 5, 8 then where can I put n?

This is correct.
v_leonardo wrote:
from (1), n has to be between 1 and 5-. So 1<n<5- --> SUFF

This is Wrong:

From Statement 1:The median of the numbers in S is less than 5.
This means the median can anything less than 5
Case 1:Let n=3;
eg:-2, 1,3,5,8---Here the median is 3( Which is less than 5) and (n=3) is between 0 and 7. Thus Yes( This is a Yes/ No type DS question)
Case 2: Let n=-100;
eg:-100,-2, 1,5,8------Here the median is 1 ( Which is less than 5) and (n=-100) is not between 0 and 7.Thus No
Hence Statement 1 is not sufficient.

v_leonardo wrote:
from (2), n has to be between 1+ and 5, So 1+<n<5 --> SUFF

This is also Incorrect:
Moving on to Statement 2:The median of the numbers in S is greater than 1.
Case 1:Let n=3;
eg:-2, 1,3,5,8---Here the median is 3( Which is greater than 1) and (n=3) is between 0 and 7. Thus Yes
Case 2: Let n=100;
eg:-2,1,5,8,100,-------Here the median is 5 ( Which is greater than 1) and (n=100) is not between 0 and 7.Thus No
Hence Statement 2 is not sufficient.

Combining both Statements together,
The median of the numbers should be between 1 and 5.
Mathematically, 1<Median<5
Try for extreme cases here ( You can also opt for the conventional method by checking values that satisfy the condition)
Case 1: Try putting n=( More than 7). eg: n=8
ie; -2,1,5,8,8...For all cases where n>=7, the median will be 5. But as per our condition 1<Median<5.
Case 2: Try putting n=(Less than 0). eg: n=-1
ie;-2,-1,1,5,8...For all cases where n<=0, the median will be 1 , which again violates our condition of 1<Median<5.

Therefore,Only values of n where 0< n< 7, will satisfy 1<Median<5. Hence answer is C.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: If set S consists of the numbers 1, 5, -2, 8, and n,
 Post Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:08 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 6765
the above poster has produced a nice solution involving number plugging; here is a more intuitive solution.

consider the five different positions in which n could be placed:
(POSITION 1: n < -2)
-2
(POSITION 2: -2 < n < 1)
1
(POSITION 3: 1 < n < 5)
5
(POSITION 4: 5 < n < 8)
8
(POSITION 5: n > 8)
note that, in addition to these five positions, n could also be chosen to be equal to any of the four numbers -2, 1, 5, 8, since there is no conditions stating that the five numbers must be distinct from each other.

let's examine the statements with respect to these five positions.


If set S consists of the numbers 1, 5, -2, 8, and n, is 0< n< 7?

Quote:
(1) The median of the numbers in S is less than 5.

this means that n could be
* anything in position 1
* -2
* anything in position 2
* 1
or
* anything in position 3.
try writing these cases out if you don't see why.
insufficient, since this list contains numbers that are both inside and outside the range 0 < n < 7.

Quote:
(2) The median of the numbers in S is greater than 1.


this means that n could be
* anything in position 3
* 5
* anything in position 4
* 8
or
* anything in position 5.
again, try writing these cases out if you don't see why.
insufficient, since this list contains numbers that are both inside and outside the range 0 < n < 7.

--

together:
looking at the two lists in unison, notice that the only range that's in both lists is position 3. therefore, if we take the two statements together, n must be in position 3.
all the numbers in position 3 fall into the range 0 < n < 7, so this statement is sufficient.

answer (c)


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: