| Author |
Message |
|
mschwrtz
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 3:51 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 504
|
|
Yes, "most of them at least as large as Jupiter" modifies "planets." Notice that the only verb in C is "have detected," so you don't have a run-on sentence.
A run-on sentence is one in which at least two independent clauses are joined without the appropriate punctuation. You can't have to independent clauses if you don't have two clauses, and you can't have two clauses if you don't have two verbs.
"Circling" is not a verb in C, but a modifier.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
alvin8139
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 5:17 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 14
|
Guest wrote: In the past several years, astronomers have detected more than 80 massive planets, most of them as large or larger than Jupiter, which circle other stars.
most of them as large or larger than Jupiter, which circle
most of them as large or larger than Jupiter and circling
most of them at least as large as Jupiter, circling
mostly at least as large as Jupiter, which circle
mostly as large or larger than Jupiter, circling
POE'd to ABC. I'm completely lost after that point. My questions are: 1. In choice D, since 'circle' is singular, 'which' therefore can only refer to 'massive planets'. Why 'which circle' is wrong and is illogical to refer to 'massive planets'? Is 'mostly' wrong here? 2. In OA choice C, "comma Ing form -, circling" can refer to a phrase "most of them...". I understand COMMA ING can only modify entire preceding clause instead of phrase. Pls help with that, MG instructor. thx a lot
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
tim
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:44 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 4404 Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
|
|
1) irrelevant question. none of us instructors said that "which circle" cannot refer to "massive planets"..
2) just plain wrong. read our materials on the use of comma -ING. pay particular attention to the difference between comma which, comma -ING, and -ING without comma..
_________________ Tim Sanders Manhattan GMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kvitkod
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:30 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 27
|
Dear experts, Why D is wrong? As i understand, (1) "Mostly" is acceptable (but with minor flaw)(2) "at least as large as" - is ok (3) "which circle" - clearly refers to palnetS Quote: "Mostly" could mean "for the most part." Does this mean most of the moons, or does it mean each moon for the most part? Probably the first, but a bit unclear. More importantly, "as large or larger than" is incorrect. It would have to be "as large AS or larger than." In its current form it is sort of saying "as large ... than," which is unidiomatic.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:40 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 8087
|
kvitkod wrote: Dear experts,
Why D is wrong?
As i understand, (1) "Mostly" is acceptable (but with minor flaw) you shouldn't be thinking in terms of “minor flaws” -- basically, things are either correct or incorrect. this is quite binary: if something is not correct, then it's incorrect. in any case, “mostly” is absolutely not acceptable here. “mostly” is an ADVERB, so it's stuck modifying the adjective(s) that follow -- i.e., the meaning of this sentence would be “mostly, but not entirely, at least as large as ...” this is a total nonsense meaning -- there's no way to make sense of it -- so it's incorrect. short version: an adverb can't modify "planets", which is a noun. (2) "at least as large as" - is ok (3) "which circle" - clearly refers to palnetS Quote: "Mostly" could mean "for the most part." Does this mean most of the moons, or does it mean each moon for the most part? Probably the first, but a bit unclear. More importantly, "as large or larger than" is incorrect. It would have to be "as large AS or larger than." In its current form it is sort of saying "as large ... than," which is unidiomatic. [/quote]
_________________ Being well-dressed gives a feeling of inward tranquillity [that] religion is powerless to bestow. C.F. Forbes
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kvitkod
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:18 am |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 27
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
tim
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:52 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 4404 Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
|
|
:)
_________________ Tim Sanders Manhattan GMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
teal777
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:42 pm |
|
 |
| Forum Guests |
|
|
Posts: 5
|
|
I know that D is wrong but I have a question. What does 'which' refer to in choice D - Jupiter or planets?
In general we can have a construction as per the SC guide -
Main clause, appositive modifier, which modifier
In the above construction which will modify the ending noun of the main clause and the not the noun of the appositive modifier. Please correct me if I am wrong?
eg. Hari has a son, a consultant, who goes to Harvard.
In the above construction what noun will who refer to - consultant or son?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:19 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 8087
|
teal777 wrote: I know that D is wrong but I have a question. What does 'which' refer to in choice D - Jupiter or planets? in general, it's not wise to opine about these kinds of things in wrong answers. can you find any official problems that contain the same kind of construction in a correct answer? in any case, it's definitely not jupiter, because in this particular instance “which” is plural (as required by the plural verb “circle” that follows it). so, it's either “planets” or nothing. however, whether “which” is allowed to stand for something that's so far away from it is an issue that is best left unresolved until we see an officially correct answer. Quote: eg. Hari has a son, a consultant, who goes to Harvard.
In the above construction what noun will who refer to - consultant or son? in this example, “son” and “consultant” are the same person, so there is nothing that needs to be resolved.
_________________ Being well-dressed gives a feeling of inward tranquillity [that] religion is powerless to bestow. C.F. Forbes
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
davetzulin
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:41 pm |
|
 |
| Forum Guests |
|
|
Posts: 143
|
Quote: in any case, “mostly” is absolutely not acceptable here. “mostly” is an ADVERB, so it's stuck modifying the adjective(s) that follow -- i.e., the meaning of this sentence would be “mostly, but not entirely, at least as large as ...” this is a total nonsense meaning -- there's no way to make sense of it -- so it's incorrect. short version: an adverb can't modify "planets", which is a noun. Hi Ron, I'm splitting hairs here, but when I read that answer choice i thought that the "mostly" adverb was modifying "astronomers have detected" and crossed it out. i looked for the nearest verb. How did you know it was modifying the following clause? I'm in agreement it is wrong either way. In the past several years, astronomers have detected more than 80 massive planets, mostly at least as large as Jupiter, which circle other stars.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:06 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 8087
|
|
dave, look at the stuff directly attached to the adverb. if the adverb is attached to things without an intervening comma, then its primary commitment is to describing those things.
_________________ Being well-dressed gives a feeling of inward tranquillity [that] religion is powerless to bestow. C.F. Forbes
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
some2none
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:09 am |
|
 |
| Forum Guests |
|
|
Posts: 3
|
|
In the correct answer, the modifier
"circling other stars" seems to imply that astromers discovered 80 massive planets while they were circling other stars.
In the past several years, astronomers have detected more than 80 massive planets, ..... , circling other stars.
Is the above interpretation wrong?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
davetzulin
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 1:32 pm |
|
 |
| Forum Guests |
|
|
Posts: 143
|
|
some2none,
this looks like a case Ron brought up before. Since the modifier "most of them at least as large..." is blocked off by commas on both sides, then it makes comma + circling look like a + -ing modifier for everything that comes before, modifying the subject of the sentence, astronauts.
however, that comma does not exist for the comma + ing purpose. just imagine removing that entire non-essential modifier
astronmers have detected more than 80 massive planets circling other stars
i think that's what you meant, because that's the only way circling could modify astronomers.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 3:56 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 8087
|
|
dave, that is a nice analysis.
_________________ Being well-dressed gives a feeling of inward tranquillity [that] religion is powerless to bestow. C.F. Forbes
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
vinny4nyc
|
Post subject: Re: In the past several years, astronomers Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:37 am |
|
 |
| Forum Guests |
|
|
Posts: 23
|
RonPurewal wrote: dave, that is a nice analysis. Hi Ron I am still confused about circling modifying the entire clause here. I believe that -ing modifier can also be used when the action is simultaneious with the main action. sc-crack-gmat-test-q-t704-15.htmlInlining your post to give a context: the "comma + ing" modifier should only be used when: (A) it MODIFIES THE ENTIRE ACTION of the preceding clause, and it APPLIES TO THE SUBJECT of that clause; AND (B) one of the following is true: (1) the "ing" action is SIMULTANEOUS with the main action; - i ran down the sidewalk, flapping my arms wildly (2) the "ing" action is a DIRECT CONSEQUENCE of the main action. - i got a 100 on the most recent exam, bringing my average up to 91 Reason I am asking is I eliminated the correct answer choice . Is it just common sense that determines the role of the -ing modifier or is there a rule that I should revisit. Cheers Vinayak
|
|
 |
|
 |
|