pratik.munjal wrote:
Perhaps Ron or Stacey can add more depth to this explanation. Also, they might explain why that "rule" of arranging numbers in ascending order is not used here (my guess is that the rule is not used because the "amount earned" has a "frequency" attached to it.)
Actually, Stacey did suggest listing out the values in ascending order. Please see what we have below. I would look at this and say to myself, "since there are twenty numbers the median will be the average of numbers 10 and 11. The three smallest pay numbers are two $48s, three $70s, and four $80s. That is nine numbers. Thus, I know that numbers 10 and 11 must be the next two numbers, which will be in the $84 category.
Day Salary
1 48
2 48
3 70
4 70
5 70
6 80
7 80
8 80
9 80
10 84
11 84
12 84
13 84
14 84
15 84
16 84
17 96
18 96
19 96
20 96