Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: CAT RC question (Inference)
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:32 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 1
When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society that was divided between master and white servants brought from Europe. In most parts of the South, some of these first African slaves became free either through escape or through emancipation by their owners. It is therefore a misconception that all African Americans in the pre-Civil War South were slaves. Many researchers have also assumed that these free African Americans were the offspring of white slave owners who took advantage of their female slaves. However, these cases represent only a small minority of free African Americans in the South. Most free African Americans were actually the descendants of African American men and white servant women.
In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century. It appears that such births were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. Over two hundred African American families in Virginia descended from white women. Forty-six families descended from freed slaves, twenty-nine from Indians, and sixteen from white men who married or had children by free African American women. It is likely that the majority of the remaining families descended from white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century, when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.
The history of free African Americans families in colonial New York and New Jersey, by contrast, is quite different from that of free African Americans in the South. Most were descended from slaves freed by the Dutch West India Company between 1644 and 1664 or by individual owners. Researchers have studied these families, especially a group of fourteen families that scholars have traced through at least three generations. None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man. However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized.


The passage suggests which of the following about African American families in colonial New York and New Jersey?


a)They were not descended from white servant women and African American men.

b) They were less numerous than African American families in the colonial South.

c) Most of them were started between 1644 and 1664.

d)They began with an initial group of fourteen families.

e)Some of them may have descended from white servant women.

OA : e

Can someone please explain how?
The OA suggests from the last Para "None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man.However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized."

I cannot make out the relevance of the second sentence though and how it contributes to (E). I can't understand it's connection with the first sentence!!! How is it that some couples having children baptized = Possible descended from White Servant Women?

(BTW, I'm not from America and am not Christian...I hope that nuance is irrelevant to understanding of the problem).


Top 
 Post subject: Re: CAT RC question (Inference)
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:11 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 54
This the catch in Suggest Questions:What is directly mentioned in the passage can't be the answer. What the Para talks about is that 14 famalies have no descedents but he does that there were a few such couples according to the cruch, and neither does he mention that only those 14 were families present


Top 
 Post subject: Re: CAT RC question (Inference)
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:57 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 903
Location: St. Louis, MO
r_gaurav wrote:
Can someone please explain how?
The OA suggests from the last Para "None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man.However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized."

I cannot make out the relevance of the second sentence though and how it contributes to (E). I can't understand it's connection with the first sentence!!! How is it that some couples having children baptized = Possible descended from White Servant Women?

(BTW, I'm not from America and am not Christian...I hope that nuance is irrelevant to understanding of the problem).

You can read "had children baptized" as simply "had children." Baptisms are events that would be recorded by the church, leaving evidence for modern-day researchers. (Much like a birth, marriage, or death certificate would be recorded.) Having the cultural context probably helps, but the passage does say "records...show...a few such couples" with children. In the previous sentence, "such couples" were defined as "a white servant woman and an African American man."

_________________
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT


Top 
 Post subject: Re: CAT RC question (Inference)
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:05 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 48
Emily,

The passage states -

"In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century."

Are you supposed to assume here that the servant women were the white colonists?

Common sense would say that the white colonists are the one who colonized African/other countries and brought bonded labor from these countries to the Americas. Also, the passage states that the white servants were brought from Europe.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: CAT RC question (Inference)
 Post Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:05 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 1779
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
GS, I cannot see how the answer to your question would be relevant to a proper analysis of the passage. As such, my advice would be not to concern yourself with answering unnecessary questions. The general rule though is not to assume anything that cannot be directly supported by the passage..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: