Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: verb
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:17 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 11
Each company claims its glasses and projection-system technology is better
a. same
b. are better.
c. that are better
d. ,which is better
e. is best


Top 
 Post subject: Re: verb
 Post Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:45 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 6765
rico16rad wrote:
Each company claims its glasses and projection-system technology is better
a. same
b. are better.
c. that are better
d. ,which is better
e. is best


please state the source of this question; we can't answer problems that don't quote the source. see the forum rules (first post in this folder).

we will remove this post if you don't quote the source.

thank you!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: verb
 Post Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:25 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 11
rico16rad wrote:
Each company claims its glasses and projection-system technology is better
a. same
b. are better.
c. that are better
d. ,which is better
e. is best


The source is Newyork times newpaper.
It was a single statment but i created different answer options for it.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: verb
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:56 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 37
I would say "are better"

the conjunction "and" is joining two nouns , hence making the object noun (glasses + tech..) plural.

_________________
i ask so i can answer / i answer so i can learn


Top 
 Post subject: Re: verb
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:17 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 32
x


Last edited by pawan_chitturu on Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Post subject: Re: verb
 Post Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:34 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 6765
if this problem were to show up on the gmat, it would almost certainly contain "that" between "claims" and "its". (i've only seen one similar construction in which "that" was unexpectedly eliminated, and, in that case, it was specifically eliminated to rid the sentence of an undesirable repeated construction -- see here:
post8963.html#p8963)

in any case, choice (b) is definitely viable, since we can certainly view "glasses" and "projection-system technology" as separate entities.

the operative issue, though (and one that has no easy resolution, since you created this problem yourself), is whether "glasses" may also be viewed as an adjective -- i.e., whether there is a such thing as "glasses technology".
if such a construction exists, then this problem is ambiguous, and choice (a) is also correct -- in that case, you can view "glasses" and "projection-system" as parallel adjectives that both modify "technology". (if you don't see what i mean, it's the same sort of construction as "red and yellow onions").


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: