![]() |
| A certain jar contains only "b" black marbles |
| Re: GMATPrep - Practice Test 2 - Problem #7 |
|
givemeanid
Guest
|
The question asks whether r/(b+w+r) > w/(b+w+r) or in other words is r > w? 1. r(b+r) > w(b+w) br + r^2 > bw + w^2 br - bw > w^2 - r^2 b(r-w) > (w-r)(w+r) r-w > (w-r)(w+r)/b ----> We know b is positive. So, we can divide both sides without changing the inequality r-w > k(w-r) ----> Where k > 0 as b,r and w are all positive This is true only when r > w. If r < w, left side is -ve and right side is +ve and the inequality doesn't hold. SUFFICIENT. 2. b - w > r b > w + r This doesn't tell us anything about relationship between w and r. INSUFFICIENT. Answer is A. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| A different way |
|
Anadi
Guest
|
Suppose total is T , T=r+b+w
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r) r/(b+w+r-r) > w/(b+w+r-w) r/(t-r) > w/(t-w) Since t>r and t>w, we can cross multiply. rt-rw > wt-rw rt > wt Since t > 0 r > w So 1 is sufficient. 2 is obviously not sufficient. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Harish Dorai
Guest
|
You guys are brilliant! The explanation makes perfect sense and the answer is (A).
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
givemeanid
Guest
|
Anadi, I like your solution. Good thinking.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Stacey Koprince
MGMAT STAFF
|
You guys are all doing a great job here - you don't even need me! :)
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| A certain jar contains only "b" black marbles |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.

