 |
| Author |
Message |
|
GMAT PREP 2
|
Post subject: Linda and the BOXEs Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:43 pm |
|
|
|
|
Linda, Robert and Pat packed a certain number of boxes with books. What is the ration of the number of books that Robert packed to the number of books that PAt packed?
1 Linda packed 30% of all the boxes
2 Robert packed 10 boxes more than Pat.
Thanks!!
Ruben
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StaceyKoprince
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:34 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 3956 Location: San Francisco
|
|
First, I assume that "ration" is supposed to read "ratio"? :) Also, is this definitely a GMATPrep problem? I would have expected them to say that there were no partial boxes packed or something like that - I guess it doesn't really matter. Just surprising.
A ratio tells us the relative amounts of something but not the absolute amounts. Since they're asking for a ratio, we only need to know how much Robert packs relative to Pat - we don't necessarily need to know their exact, actual amounts. The ratio, however must be constant - that is, I have to find one definitive ratio.
Statement 1 tells us that Linda packed 30% relative to the others. The others, therefore, combined to pack 70%. This doesn't let us know what Robert packed relative to Pat, though. Not sufficient; eliminate A and D.
Statement 2 tells us that Robert packed 10 boxes more than Pat. This tells us a relative amount but is not sufficient to calculate a single, constant ratio. For example, Robert could have packed 20 to Pat's 10, for a ratio of 20:10 or 2:1. Or Robert could have packed 30 to Pat's 20, for a ratio of 30:20, or 3:2. Those are different ratios, so not sufficient. Eliminate B.
Combining the statements: If the boxes total 100, then according to the first statement, L packed 30 and R+P packed 70. The second statement means that R packed 40 and P packed 30, for a ratio of 40:30 or 4:3. If the boxes total 20, then L packed 4 and R+P packed 16. In this case, R packed 13 and P packed 3, for a ratio of 13:3, which can't be simplified. Those are different ratios, so not sufficient. Eliminate C. (Note: you can pick any numbers you want to test this, so use numbers that are easy for you.)
Answer is E.
_________________ Stacey Koprince Instructor Director of Online Community ManhattanGMAT
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hardwick1010
|
Post subject: Re: Linda and the BOXEs Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 6:02 pm |
|
 |
| Course Students |
|
|
Posts: 2
|
Quote: If the boxes total 20, then L packed 4 and R+P packed 16. In this case, R packed 13 and P packed 3, for a ratio of 13:3, which can't be simplified Wouldn't 30% of 20 be 6, leaving 14 to be packed by R and P? Just to clarify...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RonPurewal
|
Post subject: Re: Linda and the BOXEs Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:01 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 4419
|
hardwick1010 wrote: Quote: If the boxes total 20, then L packed 4 and R+P packed 16. In this case, R packed 13 and P packed 3, for a ratio of 13:3, which can't be simplified Wouldn't 30% of 20 be 6, leaving 14 to be packed by R and P? Just to clarify...heh, yes. looks good. of course, this doesn't affect the fact that the answer to the problem is (e). but, good eyes.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
 |