The proliferation of so called cybersquatters, people who register the internet domain names of high profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, let to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

a. passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

b.the passage of the Anti Cybersquatting Consumer protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell.

c. the passage in 1999 of the Anti Cybersquatting Consumer protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

d the Anti Cybersquatting Consumer protection Act,which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

e. the Anti Cybersquatting Consumer protection Act,passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling.


Please provide a detailed explaination to your findings. Thanks

Is the correct answer (A)

Please post the source (author) and reference (test, book name, page number, whatever is appropriate) for any problems you post. Thanks!