![]() |
| OG - DS - #91 |
| OG DS 91 |
|
angiekara
Guest
|
Why is it that the percent change is not enough information to solve this? If you use 100% for the whole and compare the difference, isn't that enough?
Thank you! |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Greg
Guest
|
angiekara - I believe your statement implicitly assumes that the value of X (or the "100%" you reference in your message) is the same in 1970 & 1980. If this were true, then and only then could we use the information contained in the two statements to arrive at the percent change requested in the problem:
(((1/2)*X) - ((2/3)*X)) / ((2/3)*X) = Requested Percentage Change (you see, the Xs all cancel, leaving us with a straight numerical calculation giving us the actual percentage change, which is what is requestred in the problem). However, the question stem doesn't state as such (nor do statements 1 and 2), so we're left wondering whether if X changed in 1970 & 1980 - hence, both statements together remain insufficient. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Stacey Koprince
MGMAT STAFF
|
Try it with real numbers to see this more concretely.
Statement 1 (1970): X = $15 median household income. That would make the median income of Y = $10 Statement 2 (1980): a) X = $15 med. HH income. That would make the med. income of Y = $7.5. b) X = $10 med HH income. That would make the med. income of Y = $5. Did Y go from 10 to 7.5 or from 10 to 5? Those will give different percentage decreases and both are valid possibilities. Insufficient. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| OG - DS - #91 |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.

