![]() |
| Question bank: Is |x|<1? (Data sufficiency) |
|
Guest
|
Can someone from the MGMAT staff help or indicate if I did not follow the sticky? I read it and it seems fine. This was posted quite a few days ago. Thanks
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
|
the best way for you to handle these is simply to memorize the template on which their solutions are built.
if you have |x| < 1, that translates as -1 < x < 1. in general, if you have |x| < A, where A is a positive number, you can render that equation as -A < x < A. the proof of this rephrase lies along almost exactly the same lines as the work you've shown here, but you should NOT perform that same work whenever you encounter one of these inequalities in the field; that's simply not reasonable with the sort of time constraints you're going to be dealing with. instead, just memorize: |x| < A --> -A < x < A |x| > A --> x < -A or x > A in the extremely unlikely event that A is negative, the first inequality has no solution at all, and the second will be solved by any value of x. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
A4Fever
Guest
|
Thanks! Will do...
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Question bank: Is |x|<1? (Data sufficiency) |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.


