![]() |
| A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set |
| answer |
|
mjtian
Guest
|
oooppse, forgot to post the answer: e) 100
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Guest
|
S = P + 0.4S
0.6S = 150 S = 150/0.6 = 250 Profit = 40% of 250 = 100 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
mjtian
Guest
|
Thanks! Algebra was never my strong suit, I wish GMAT tested Calculus instead.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Faith20
Guest
|
Cost Price of Desk = $150
Mark - up = 40% of S.P. i.e. cost price = 60% of S.P. Let x be the Selling price of the desk, then 60% of S.P. = 150 x=$250 Therefore, profit = $250 - $150 = $100 Ans. (e) |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Dan Bernstein
MGMAT STAFF
|
Good explanations all!
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| got the math |
|
guest128
Guest
|
great. get it conceptually and mathematically. but can you please help explain the "selling price"? There are two selling prices and how did you know that the selling price indicated by "...if the dealer sold the desk at the selling price" which selling price it is?
i get confused whether it was 0.6S OR 1.4S. Can someone please help? It may be very obvious but I'd really appreciate it. this is something i can apply to other probs. i admit the language can mess me up sometimes. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Re: got the math |
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
|
there are not two selling prices. there is exactly one price in the problem that is actually CALLED "the selling price", a terminology whose use is absolutely consistent throughout the problem statement. the gmat is VERY strict about this sort of thing, by the way. they will brook absolutely no ambiguity in problem statements, although you occasionally have to learn and internalize the ways in which they use certain words (such as "either" in this problem). here's a trick that might help you: if you get confused by a certain wording, simply take that wording out of the problem wherever it appears, and replace it with something else. so, let's transform this statement... A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set the selling price equal to the purchase price plus a markup that was 40% of the selling price. If the dealer sold the desk at the selling price, what was the amount of the dealer's gross profit from the purchase and the sale of the desk? into this statement... A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set the delicious price equal to the purchase price plus a markup that was 40% of the delicious price. If the dealer sold the desk at the delicious price, what was the amount of the dealer's gross profit from the purchase and the sale of the desk? there, that's probably easier to think about. -- summa veritas: BE VERY LITERAL when you read math problem statements. do not, EVER, infer any more information than is actually stated. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| A furniture dealer purchased a desk for $150 and then set |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.


