![]() |
| OG - Quant Review - PS - #175 |
| GMAT OG Quant Review PS #175 |
|
Stacey Koprince
MGMAT STAFF
|
This is exactly the kind of question that the vast majority of people should skip on the actual test. It is incredibly difficult to do this question in 2 minutes, even if you completely understand ratios. I'll tell you how to do so below, but just FYI - if you're seeing something like this for the first time, most people will not be able to figure it out in the allotted time.
Notice first, it's a Roman Numeral question. These are always more time-consuming that regular PS questions because you essentially have to solve it 3 times. That's your first warning sign. Then, the complexity of the question itself also clues you in that this is probably a good "educated guess and move on" question. Now, here's the "intuitive math" way. First sketch a picture so you can keep straight what's going on in the problem. The given ratio of tiled:untiled is 25:39. Write this ratio as: tiled area:untiled area:total area 25x:39x:64x (the x represents the unknown multiplier for this ratio) because this is a square, we can also determine that tiled side: xxxxx :total side (note: I'm ignoring the untiled part because there isn't an "untiled side") 5SQRTx: xxx : 8SQRTx So the ratio for the side of the inner square to the side of the larger square is 5:8 and this is algebraically represented as 5SQRTx:8SQRTx, where x represents the unknown multiplier. The problem gave no constraints for either the unknown multiplier or for any of the values in the problem (that is, we could have a fractional side or a fractional multiplier). The multiplier, x, can therefore be anything. The width of the untiled part will be equal to (8SQRTx - 5SQRTx)/2 (because there is a width on each side of the inner square - consult your picture to see this). If x can be anything, then so can the width... so all three possible roman numerals work. E. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Guest
Guest
|
Thanks Stacy. I understand your methodology for answering the question and your rationale for why an educated guess may be sufficient on this problem type.
much appreciated, Jake |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| OG - Quant Review - PS - #175 |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.


