![]() |
| OG question 93 SC- Question is not posted.. just a reference |
|
guest
Guest
|
Hi Ron,
can you reply to this. Appreciate it thanks, |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
|
nope. in that problem, the pronoun actually has a unique referent: the cia.
"it" can't refer to the supreme court, because the supreme court is the subject of the same sentence. if the sentence were supposed to say that the supreme court awarded itself powers, you'd have to use the pronoun "itself" (not just it). -- however, there are occasionally problems in which all of the answer choices do, in fact, have pronouns that are technically ambiguous. (one such example is o.g. verbal supplement #19.) in these problems, if the non-ambiguity check fails, the second line of defense is to pick pronouns that are grammatically parallel to the intended antecedent. so if the intended antecedent is the subject of its clause, then, ideally, you'd have a pronoun that's also the subject of its clause. (notice that you shouldn't think about this parallelism issue unless all of the otherwise correct answer choices fail the ambiguity check.) |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| OG question 93 SC- Question is not posted.. just a reference |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.


