![]() |
| Chances in Top 10? |
|
MBAApply
Guest
|
In short, you should be competitive for all the schools you mentioned (i.e. the schools are in your league and your resume wouldn't feel out of place compared to the other current students at these schools). However, it's also likely going to be a competitive year and you never know -- there is a chance that you won't get into any of those top school as well. Which means having some backups unless you are a "top5 school or bust" kind of guy (which is fine). That may mean looking at perhaps 1-2 schools in the Duke/Darden/Michigan/NYU/UCLA/Berkeley/Cornell/Yale range to complement the other top schools.
A lot of it comes down to a combination of how well you execute the application (both the written app and the interview) as well as a bit of luck (getting adcoms that happen to like you, as opposed to those who just may say "I'm not feelin' it" -- unfortunately it can be that subjective and they can accept or deny you for any reason or no reason at all). You have the numbers (GMAT/strong grades), blue chip resume, and enough extracurriculars to show that you're not just a "work, work, work" guy but someone who is well rounded, so at this point all you can do is to just focus on the written app when it comes out in a few months' time. Alex Chu alex@mbaapply.com www.mbaapply.com http://mbaapply.blogspot.com |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Guest
|
Thanks for the reply!
One more thing, does that fact that my work ex. will be 2 years act as a negative point in my application irrespective of the learning, leadership demonstrated and quality of work done? I know its below the average work ex. but I am not sure how the schools evaluate this parameter. Thanks, PR |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
MBAApply
Guest
|
Work experience might be an issue (i.e. 1 extra year may be a little better) but schools particularly HBS, Stanford and Wharton are looking for younger candidates -- those with 2-3 years work experience as opposed to 4-6 which has been the case for the past 8-10 years.
You might as well apply this year and give it your best shot - if you don't get in, you can always reapply and still be well within range. Alex Chu alex@mbaapply.com www.mbaapply.com http://mbaapply.blogspot.com |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Pramod Rao
Guest
|
Thanks for your feedback. Appreciate your views.
PR |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Pramod Rao
Guest
|
Hi,
This is a query just to get your point of view on school rankings in terms of specializations to add to my list. The following is what I have gathered so far (From school rankings and other web searches): HBS - General management, Organizational behavior (weak in terms of finance and accounting due to case method) Stanford - Entrepreneurship,General management,Finance Wharton- Finance, accounting are major strengths (not so strong in entrepreneurship) Kellogg- Marketing MIT-Manufacturing/operations, Supply chain, Entrepreneurship I am more focussed on the schools which are strong in Entreprenurship, general management and finance (in that order). The school websites generally don't give a lot of indication on this as they would obviously say good about all their courses! I have started off with these schools and will analyze the top 20 but just wanted to have your point of view on which schools do you think are strong in the above mentioned fields? Ultimately I want to narrow my list down from say 10-15 (where it stands right now) to 3-4. Waiting to hear from you. Regards, PR |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
MBAApply
Guest
|
Your assessment is a little too simplistic.
The top schools are "top" precisely because they are great across the board. Business is business - it's not about specialities, but about the whole. That's what an MBA is about - to give you a broad base of skills and knowledge that can help prepare you for a business career. Kellogg may be known for marketing, but that doesn't mean it's other departments suck. Far from it. Same with HBS -- it may be known for "general management" but that doesn't mean it sucks in finance. Same with Wharton -- it's renowned for its finance faculty, but it's exceptional across the board. Also, it's hard to tell what you mean by specializations -- is it quality of academics/faculty, or career placement (as those are very separate things). If you're talking about career placement, any of the top schools will give you very similar opportunities or access -- it comes down to the individual (remember that the "MBA" doesn't put you on equal footing with your classmates - everyone has a work history/resume prior to their b-school which also matters for recruiting). You're looking at the wrong things when it comes to selecting b-schools. You'll get a phenomenal education at ANY of the top schools -- it comes down to other aspects which are far more important that differentiate schools -- student culture, geographic location (which impacts student culture), locale (urban, suburban or rural - also impacts your experience and culture), and school size (small vs. large schools have different cultures). These are far more important than the actual academics or career placement when it comes to comparing top schools - since along these metrics, they are practically the same in reality -- you're going to have a mix of phenomenal profs and bad profs at all schools, and you'll have renowned and up-and-coming profs teaching you. The recruiters more or less go to the same schools, so comparing Kellogg vs. Wharton vs. Stanford vs. HBS in terms of career placement is particularly useful since they give you the same access. The differences in percentages, salaries, etc. are more a function of student self-selection (i.e. if you are going to stay in the Midwest, your salary is going to be lower than say someone working in NYC; those choosing banking will make more money than those choosing leadership development programs; and so forth). Alex Chu alex@mbaapply.com www.mbaapply.com http://mbaapply.blogspot.com |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Guest
|
I have also been looking at other factors (class size, culture etc) to determine the schools but I guess my previous post did not talk about it. Anyways,Thanks for making those points.
PR |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Chances in Top 10? |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.

