george.kourdin wrote:
is it correst to eluminate answers choices that use the <still continue(s)> construction because it's redundant/akward? if something continues to occur, it is by definition on-going, and the word still does not seem to be necessary because it re-emphasizes an the fact that it is an on-going process. it's not like the phrase is blah blah something still happens (still is necessary here and changes the meaning of the sentence, correct or am i off?).
thank you
i think you could make that elimination, yes.
if you are faced with the choice between "continue(s)" and "still continue(s)" -- as in this problem -- then you can make that elimination with 100% confidence.