Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: outght to be && subjunctive mood.
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:03 am 
Renowned economist Susan Albernaght once stated,
as an illustration of opportunity cost, that a company
that earned a return lower than the interest rate on a
savings account ought to be
liquidated and the
proceeds distributed to the shareholders.

that a company that earned a return lower than
the interest rate on a savings account ought
to be

that a company, earning a return lower that
the interest on a savings account, should be

that a company which earned returns lower than
savings account interest rates ought to be

a company that was earning a lower return
than a savings account was

a company earning a return lower than that of
a savings account should be


OA is A. i agree that A is better. Is "A" really following the rules of parallelism and subjunctive mood ?

Note: the question is from Princeton.


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:48 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 6077
Location: San Francisco
I'm sorry it has taken us so long to get to your question.

Can you elaborate on your question? What part of A do you think should be parallel? And where do you think the sentence should use subjunctive mood?

_________________
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director of Online Community
ManhattanGMAT


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: