Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: OG - SC - #D36
 Post Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:37 pm 
Hey Andrew,

Here's one from the OG on parallel construction: #D36

New data from the United States Forest Service ecologists show that for every dollar spent on controlled small scale burning, forest thinning, and the training of fire management personnel, it saves esvendollars that would not be spent on having to extinquish big fires.

This one was a little unwieldly: please verify that I'm correct for right reason

B. That for every dollar spent on controlled small-scale burning, forest thinning, and the training of fire-management personnel, seven dollars are saved that would have een spent on extinguishing - correct

C. that for every dollar spent on controlled small-scale burning, forest thining, and the training of fire-management personnel, saves seven dollars on not having to extinguish

C. no complete sentence; subject of second clause not provided - so wrong
[/u]


Top 
 Post subject: Official GUide GMAT problem
 Post Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:11 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 43
Hello,

You are correct in your read that answer choice (C) is unparallel (and gramatically incorrect) because of a lack of a subject or a noun that is parallel to every dollar.

Good work! :) - Andrew


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: