Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

Forums Home » Ask An Instructor » GMAT Math » Official Guide Math


 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 



  Print view Print view Previous topic Previous topic | Next topic Next topic
 

OG - DS - #143, #145

Author Message
ack
 Post subject: OG - DS - #143, #145
 Post Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:22 pm 
These isssues refer to OG 11 DS problems 143 and 145 shown below

# 143

If m>0 and n>0, is (m+x)/(n+x) > m/n

(1) m<n
(2) x>0

#145

Is 1/p > r/(r^2 +2)

(1) p =r
(2) r >0

The issue I have with both these problems is that in the cae of 143 the question does not say x is not equal to -n leaving open the possiblity that the first term in the stem (m+x)/(n+x) could be undefined. I have the same issue in 145 in that the question doesn't state that p is not equal to 0 which would make the 1/p undefined. Is there a reason GMAC does not put this information in the questions?
Top 
StaceyKoprince
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:57 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 6077
Location: San Francisco
Intriguing question, as they're usually so precise about noting those things. May just be an editing error - there are lots of typos and editing errors throughout OG, unfortunately. I'm going to forward this to our curriculum director and see if he has any ideas.

Anyway, rest assured, the test does not deal with "undefined" - so we don't need to worry about that possibility.

_________________
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director of Online Community
ManhattanGMAT
Top 
christiancryan
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:25 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 79
The GMAT folks aren’t as consistent as they ought to be on this issue. Sometimes they do write the “no denominator = 0” condition, e.g. OG 11 #127 (“In the expression above, if xn does not equal zero...”) or #139 (“if x does not equal –y, is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1?”), and sometimes they don’t, as in #143 and #145. We have yet to find a problem, however, in which they failed to put that condition and then actually *tested* that you caught its absence. In other words, #143 and #145 are graded as if the condition were in place.

Somewhat similarly, if they write “the square root of x” in some expression, they won’t always say explicitly that x is non-negative, but you can assume that they don’t write undefined expressions or ones that go outside the bounds set in the OG (e.g., the square root of a negative number is an “imaginary” number, which is outside the bounds of the GMAT).
Top 
ack
 Post subject: Thanks
 Post Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:06 pm 
Stacey, Christian,

Thanks for your responses.
Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: