| Author |
Message |
|
chitts.hota
|
Post subject: Modifiers with Relative Pronouns Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:47 pm |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 2
|
|
Hello, I am new to this forum. Thanks to all you have been part of this. Coming straight to my doubt:
Source: 2003 edition SC Guide, Page 67 (towards the end of the page)
Doubt: "Cars come in many colors,which can be very cool or very ugly." Why does the guide mention that the above sentence contains an ambiguity. As I understand, which has just one antecedent and that is colors. There are 2 nouns i.e. Cars,colors , but colors is followed by "which", which suggests that cool/ugly are talking about colors.
Please correct me if have gone wrong somewhere.
Thanks in advance
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mschwrtz
|
Post subject: Re: Modifiers with Relative Pronouns Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:19 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 506
|
|
Yes, that does seem to be an infelicitous example. We don't use it in in our recent text. I don't have any 2003 texts handy, so I can't say if it might have been clearer in context. Probably the reason that this usage is described as ambiguous is that people often INCORRECTLY use "which" to modify a clause, and that seems to be what's going on in the cited example.
In any event, you understand the bottom-line issue correctly. WHICH can refer only to the noun (or noun phrase) immediately preceding it, in this case "colors."
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
chitts.hota
|
Post subject: Re: Modifiers with Relative Pronouns Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:28 pm |
|
 |
| Students |
|
|
Posts: 2
|
|
Thanks for your response. Doubt cleared :)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
tim
|
Post subject: Re: Modifiers with Relative Pronouns Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:49 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 2242 Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
|
|
Glad to hear it..
_________________ Tim Sanders Manhattan GMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|