Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Modifiers - cry for help!!
 Post Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 10:47 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 75
Hi,

I have been struggling with modifiers lately - need some help!

1. Both the following sentences have the exact same structure but one is grammatically correct and the other is not. (pg 99 SC)

Correct: Last night our air conditioner broke, causing great consternation.

Incorrect: The patient's rare disease was treated using novel techniques developed at the medical school.

Per the explanation in the guide, the underlined modifier is dangling since the sentence contains no noun that is properly modified by using novel techniques.

My question is: why is disease not considered a noun? why does this structure work for the first sentence and not the second?

#2. Correct: Ravaged by civil war for many years after it gained independence from Portugal, Angola, is now one of Africa's success stories: its economy grew by 21% last year, and parliamentary elections are to be held later this week. pg 96

My question is: how is the use of colon justified here? Shouldn't the colon be used to explain what comes after it? If so, how does having parliamentary elections define success?

#3 Correct: Regina returned the dress, which was torn at one of the seams, to the store. pg 98
Shouldn't the underlined modifier be an 'essential clause'

Stacy/Ron: Can you please help?
Thanks in advance


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Modifiers - cry for help!!
 Post Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 75
anybody?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Modifiers - cry for help!!
 Post Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:01 pm 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 2
1.The disease cannot use novel techniques.
The subject of the verb using is the disease.

2.The colon provides further explanation...
P.192

3.I think whether a clause is essential depends on the writer.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Modifiers - cry for help!!
 Post Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:29 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 24
chitrangada.maitra wrote:
Hi,

I have been struggling with modifiers lately - need some help!

1. Both the following sentences have the exact same structure but one is grammatically correct and the other is not. (pg 99 SC)

Correct: Last night our air conditioner broke, causing great consternation.

Incorrect: The patient's rare disease was treated using novel techniques developed at the medical school.

Per the explanation in the guide, the underlined modifier is dangling since the sentence contains no noun that is properly modified by using novel techniques.

My question is: why is disease not considered a noun? why does this structure work for the first sentence and not the second?

#2. Correct: Ravaged by civil war for many years after it gained independence from Portugal, Angola, is now one of Africa's success stories: its economy grew by 21% last year, and parliamentary elections are to be held later this week. pg 96

My question is: how is the use of colon justified here? Shouldn't the colon be used to explain what comes after it? If so, how does having parliamentary elections define success?

#3 Correct: Regina returned the dress, which was torn at one of the seams, to the store. pg 98
Shouldn't the underlined modifier be an 'essential clause'

Stacy/Ron: Can you please help?
Thanks in advance

Q1)
Pg 85 last line MGMAT 4th ed.SC BIBLE
Disease is the object of the verb treated.this sentence is passive
Q3)http://www.manhattangmat.com/tags/sentence-correction


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Modifiers - cry for help!!
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:48 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 8
Hi chitrangada.maitra

The sentence -
Last night our air conditioner broke, causing great consternation.

is a Action ---> Result construction (X--->Y Construction)

', Present Participle' construction can only be used
1. in X--->Y Construction cases
2. where X is Noun Clause

Note the , before -ing form

So X is noun and Causing is verb: CORRECT

The sentence -
The patient's rare disease was treated using novel techniques (lets's forget about - developed at the medical school.)

is a Result <---- Action construction ( Y<----X Construction)

X is not a Noun Clause here.. Remember A noun/Subject performs the action.. X is not a noun so who is performing the action???
No Noun>> Dangling Modifier


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Modifiers - cry for help!!
 Post Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:06 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2242
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
chitrangada.maitra wrote:
1. Both the following sentences have the exact same structure but one is grammatically correct and the other is not. (pg 99 SC)

Correct: Last night our air conditioner broke, causing great consternation.

Incorrect: The patient's rare disease was treated using novel techniques developed at the medical school.

Per the explanation in the guide, the underlined modifier is dangling since the sentence contains no noun that is properly modified by using novel techniques.

My question is: why is disease not considered a noun? why does this structure work for the first sentence and not the second?


First, these sentences do not have the exact same structure; look at the comma for the clearest evidence of this. Second, disease is definitely a noun, it is just not the thing that used novel techniques. On the other hand, in example 1 the air conditioner is definitely what caused consternation..

chitrangada.maitra wrote:
#2. Correct: Ravaged by civil war for many years after it gained independence from Portugal, Angola, is now one of Africa's success stories: its economy grew by 21% last year, and parliamentary elections are to be held later this week. pg 96

My question is: how is the use of colon justified here? Shouldn't the colon be used to explain what comes after it? If so, how does having parliamentary elections define success?


The colon itself doesn't explain anything. The part after the colon should clarify what comes before. And i'll stay out of the politics of discussing whether parliamentary elections is an appropriate measure of success for a newly-independent country. :) Suffice it to say that the author of the sentence apparently thinks this is the case..

chitrangada.maitra wrote:
#3 Correct: Regina returned the dress, which was torn at one of the seams, to the store. pg 98
Shouldn't the underlined modifier be an 'essential clause'


It depends on how many dresses she returned to the store..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: