| Author |
Message |
|
shahan25
|
Post subject: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:43 pm |
|
Posts: 8
|
|
p and q are different two-digit prime numbers with the same digits, but in reversed order. What is the value of the larger of p and q?
(1) p + q = 110 (2) p – q = 36
Why is is D not the right answer? The explanation given is as follows:
Suppose that one of the digits is even. In that case, one of p and q will be even—but there are no two-digit even primes. This indicates that both digits need to be odd, drawn from the set {1, 3, 5, 7, 9}. By a similar reasoning, we can rule out the possibility of 5 being one of the digits, as that would lead to one of the numbers ending in 5 (and therefore being divisible by 5). Lastly, we observe that the two digits cannot be identical, because that would make p and q equal.
In light of the above arguments, the only combinations of numbers that satisfy the conditions are as follows: (13, 31), (17, 71), (19, 91), (37, 73) and (79, 97). Let us now consider the statements.
I disagree with the 19/91 combination as 91 is clearly not a prime and hence can't be p/q. Can you please explain?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
esledge
|
Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:14 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 901 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
|
You are right. 91 = 7*13. I checked our database, and this has already been edited to show (D) as the answer, with the correct p and q pairs listed as justification. It's likely you looked at an old version, but nice catch!
_________________ Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
singh.181
|
Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:16 am |
|
 |
| Course Students |
|
|
Posts: 28
|
|
Sorry for bringing up this thread :(
Can expert help me in interpreting the question? I interpreted it as "which one is larger i.e either p or q"?
Stat 1: gives 37 and 73, so either p or q could be either of the values
Stat 2: gives p> q since p-q = 36.
So, choose B.
Please explain.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jnelson0612
|
Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:06 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 1857
|
singh.181 wrote: Sorry for bringing up this thread :(
Can expert help me in interpreting the question? I interpreted it as "which one is larger i.e either p or q"?
Here's the problem. You interpreted it differently from what is asked. Under your interpretation, the data is sufficient if we can say "p is larger" or "q is larger". Look at what the question says: What is the value of the larger of p and q? So to be sufficient, the data has to allow us to determine whether p or q is larger and the VALUE of that larger variable. Hope this helps!
_________________ Jamie Nelson ManhattanGMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kinshukpharma
|
Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:48 am |
|
 |
| Forum Guests |
|
|
Posts: 1
|
shahan25 wrote: p and q are different two-digit prime numbers with the same digits, but in reversed order. What is the value of the larger of p and q?
(1) p + q = 110 (2) p – q = 36
Why is is D not the right answer? The explanation given is as follows: By a similar reasoning, we can rule out the possibility of 5 being one of the digits, as that would lead to one of the numbers ending in 5 (and therefore being divisible by 5). I dont understand why 5 has been eliminated. Can someone please explain?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mithunsam
|
Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 11:41 am |
|
 |
| Course Students |
|
|
Posts: 76
|
If 5 is one of the digits, then atleast one of p or q will have unit digit 5. However, all numbers with unit digit 5 are divisible by 5. So they are not prime and we should exclude them. kinshukpharma wrote: shahan25 wrote: p and q are different two-digit prime numbers with the same digits, but in reversed order. What is the value of the larger of p and q?
(1) p + q = 110 (2) p – q = 36
Why is is D not the right answer? The explanation given is as follows: By a similar reasoning, we can rule out the possibility of 5 being one of the digits, as that would lead to one of the numbers ending in 5 (and therefore being divisible by 5). I dont understand why 5 has been eliminated. Can someone please explain?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
tim
|
Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:08 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 2242 Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
|
|
thanks mithunsam..
_________________ Tim Sanders Manhattan GMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|