Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes
 Post Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:43 pm 
Offline


Posts: 8
p and q are different two-digit prime numbers with the same digits, but in reversed order. What is the value of the larger of p and q?

(1) p + q = 110
(2) p – q = 36

Why is is D not the right answer?
The explanation given is as follows:

Suppose that one of the digits is even. In that case, one of p and q will be even—but there are no two-digit even primes. This indicates that both digits need to be odd, drawn from the set {1, 3, 5, 7, 9}. By a similar reasoning, we can rule out the possibility of 5 being one of the digits, as that would lead to one of the numbers ending in 5 (and therefore being divisible by 5). Lastly, we observe that the two digits cannot be identical, because that would make p and q equal.

In light of the above arguments, the only combinations of numbers that satisfy the conditions are as follows:
(13, 31), (17, 71), (19, 91), (37, 73) and (79, 97). Let us now consider the statements.

I disagree with the 19/91 combination as 91 is clearly not a prime and hence can't be p/q. Can you please explain?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes
 Post Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:14 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 901
Location: St. Louis, MO
You are right. 91 = 7*13. I checked our database, and this has already been edited to show (D) as the answer, with the correct p and q pairs listed as justification. It's likely you looked at an old version, but nice catch!

_________________
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT


Top 
 Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes
 Post Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:16 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 28
Sorry for bringing up this thread :(

Can expert help me in interpreting the question?
I interpreted it as "which one is larger i.e either p or q"?

Stat 1: gives 37 and 73, so either p or q could be either of the values

Stat 2: gives p> q since p-q = 36.

So, choose B.

Please explain.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes
 Post Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:06 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 1857
singh.181 wrote:
Sorry for bringing up this thread :(

Can expert help me in interpreting the question?
I interpreted it as "which one is larger i.e either p or q"?


Here's the problem. You interpreted it differently from what is asked. Under your interpretation, the data is sufficient if we can say "p is larger" or "q is larger".

Look at what the question says: What is the value of the larger of p and q?

So to be sufficient, the data has to allow us to determine whether p or q is larger and the VALUE of that larger variable.

Hope this helps!

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:48 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 1
shahan25 wrote:
p and q are different two-digit prime numbers with the same digits, but in reversed order. What is the value of the larger of p and q?

(1) p + q = 110
(2) p – q = 36

Why is is D not the right answer?
The explanation given is as follows:
By a similar reasoning, we can rule out the possibility of 5 being one of the digits, as that would lead to one of the numbers ending in 5 (and therefore being divisible by 5).



I dont understand why 5 has been eliminated. Can someone please explain?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 11:41 am 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 76
If 5 is one of the digits, then atleast one of p or q will have unit digit 5. However, all numbers with unit digit 5 are divisible by 5. So they are not prime and we should exclude them.
kinshukpharma wrote:
shahan25 wrote:
p and q are different two-digit prime numbers with the same digits, but in reversed order. What is the value of the larger of p and q?

(1) p + q = 110
(2) p – q = 36

Why is is D not the right answer?
The explanation given is as follows:
By a similar reasoning, we can rule out the possibility of 5 being one of the digits, as that would lead to one of the numbers ending in 5 (and therefore being divisible by 5).



I dont understand why 5 has been eliminated. Can someone please explain?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: MGMAT Question: Reverse Primes
 Post Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:08 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2242
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
thanks mithunsam..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: