Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Legislation to reduce Tax benefits
 Post Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:01 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 24
SOURCE: PrincetonReview

The government is considering legislation that would reduce tax benefits for parents opening college savings funds for their children. If passed, the new laws would result in greatly decreased tax benefits for parents who open such accounts. Therefore, if the new laws pass, many college-bound individuals will have difficulty covering their college costs, and some would not be able to attend.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

A. For most college-bound children, their parents’ savings accounts are the only source of educational funding.

B. The legislation is being considered because many parents were misusing savings funds dedicated to their children’s educational costs.

C. College-bound children cannot open savings funds separately from their parents.

D. Because of decreased tax benefits, some parents will not open college savings funds for their children.

E. Parents facing the new restrictions on college funds will find other investments to dedicate to their children’s educational costs.
***********************************************************************OA D****************************************************************************************888888
Could Some expert please help me find out why A is not the correct answer


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Legislation to reduce Tax benefits
 Post Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:54 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2242
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
Use the negation technique as described in the assumptions chapter of our CR strategy guide. If an assumption is necessary, negating it should cause the argument to crumble. The negation of A is that savings accounts are NOT the only source of funding. Assuming this does not ruin the conclusion that students will have difficulty covering their costs, so A is not the answer we are looking for..

BTW in case you are wondering how D is the correct answer given this analysis, please note that i am not defending D as an answer - it fails for the same reasons. i think the question is flawed, and that's why you should stick to more reliable sources for practice questions..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Legislation to reduce Tax benefits
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:10 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 7
Seems like C is the right answer.What is the OA?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Legislation to reduce Tax benefits
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:11 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 1857
pawar, the stated original answer is D.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: