pmmalkan wrote:
However, I had seen Ron's Thursday lecture on combining inequalities ... get x = integers 3 and 4.
First, let's finish reducing the equations to get:
If x > 2, what is the value of the integer x?
(1) x < 3.8
(2) -1 < x < 3.2
combining either (1) or (2) with the given X> 2, we get
2 < x < 3 + d
where d is either 0.8 [for (1)] or 0.2 [for (2)]. So, as you indicated, the answer is 3 and both are sufficient individually.
If I'm understanding you correctly, you are referring to
a > b
c > d
implies
a + c > b + d
as is referred to in
guide3-inequalities-when-shud-we-really-add-two-inequalities-t9449.htmlfor example
To do the add properly we first have to have the
inequalities pointing in the same direction so we have to re-write the if and (1) as
x > 2
3.8 > x
Adding now gives
x + 3.8 > x + 2
which just tells you 3.8 is greater than 2. If this not what you were referring to, you will have to give more details as mentioned by tim