Reply to topic
Inconsistency? Divisibility - CAT 3 - Question #3
michaeltrex@hotmail.com
Guest


Reply with quote
Okay, unless I'm reading this wrong, there is an inconsistency between these two questions?
On CAT #3, question #3 states:

"Is n/18 an integer?"
(1) 5n/18 is an integer
(2) 3n/18 is an integer


In the Number Properties Guide book on page 77, a very similar question states:

"If p is an integer, is p/18 an integer?"
(1) 5p/18 is an integer
(2) 6p/18 is an integer


As you can see, both questions and answers are very similar. CAT #3 says statement 1 is insufficient. However, in the guide book, it says statement 1 is sufficient. Let's take a step back and rephrase the question. "Are there two 3's and a 2 in p's prime box?" Looking at statement one, this should be sufficient, because there are (at least) two 3's and a 2 in p's prime box. Why does this guide book say statement one is sufficient, but exam #3 says it's insufficient??????
Inconsistency? Divisibility - CAT 3 - Question #3
Captain
Guest


Reply with quote
There is an important difference between the 2 questions. In your referred guide the question explicitly stated that 'p' is an integer. In the test qustion 'n' may need not be an integer. For the CAT question refer to the link below for explanation.

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/is-n-18-an-integer-1-5n-18-is-an-integer-2-3n-18-is-t636.html
Thank you
michaeltrex@hotmail.com
Guest


Reply with quote
Thank you
Stacey Koprince
MGMAT STAFF

Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 2007
Location: San Francisco
Reply with quote
Thanks, Captain! Doing my work for me! :)
Inconsistency? Divisibility - CAT 3 - Question #3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic